Research and development of telekinetic machines
(bilingual: in English
and Polish )
(This page is just being translated into English)
Updated:
17 March 2011
Click "X" or "No" on e.g. messages of supposed errors, or on advertisements, if these try to interrupt your viewing of this web page.
(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of all my web pages from all servers.
These are arranged primarily by language
(i.e. as web pages in Polish,
English, German,
French, Spanish,
Italian, Greek, and
Russian.) For each language web pages are
arranged by their subjects.
Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking on
"Menu 4".)
The term "telekinetics" from which the name of
this web page is derived, means the "scientific
discipline about devices for the generation of
continuous and self-propelling motion carried
out on principles of telekinesis". According to such
a name, this web page presents a report from
experiments on research and development and
on implementation to the serial factory production
the first on the Earth devices of telekinetics, means
devices which generate perpetual motion while they
do not require for this purpose the supply in any
form of energy or fuel.
Part #A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
What are goals of this web page:
The main goal of this web page and the illustrations included into it, is to present
a report from research and development carried out so-far to obtain and implement
to a serial factory production first on the Earth devices of telekinetics.
Simultaneously this web page is so designed
that it can serve as a kind of guidelines for
these hobbyists which undertake the development
of devices of telekinetics. This is because the
page reveals NOT only what was already established
experimentally on the subject of these devices
by other researchers, but it also explains what
is the correct procedure of initiation the construction
of these extraordinary devices.
This web page also extends and clarifies Part #D
of a separate web page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy,
in which the design and operation of one amongst
first prototypes of such telekinetic devices was
described. This prototype is known under the
name of "Thesta Distatica". Thesta-Distatica
belongs to a larger group of telekinetic devices
the principle of operation of which originates from
electrostatic machines, in German called the
"influenzmaschines".
Part #B:
Philosophical premises which indicate that the completion of telekinetic devices for energy generation is possible:
#B1.
The
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
reveals, that the continuous and friction-free "motion"
of the ever-moving "counter-matter" is a fundamental
behaviour in the universe:
On a number of totaliztic publications, for
example on the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm,
and also in subsection A1.1 from volume
1 of my newest
monograph [1/5],
it was explained that our "physical world" is
only a "half" of the universe. The second half
is occupied by the so-called "counter-world",
which religions call "the other world". This
"counter-world" is filled-up with an unique
substance called the "counter-matter".
In turn an unique attribute of that counter-matter
is, that otherwise than the static and inertial
matter from our physical world, the "counter-matter"
is a kind of inertia-free and friction-free liquid,
which exists in the state of continuous motion.
In turn, because this inertial and static "matter"
from our "physical world" was created just due
to appropriate pre-programming of motions of
that "counter-matter", in fact the
everlasting motion
is the most fundamental behaviour in the universe.
In other words, the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
reveals, that the continuous motion and self-sustained
supply of energy are natural behaviours of the universe,
while inertia, motionless, and the need to generate
the energy supply, are states artificially forced and
prevailing only within the body of our "physical world".
The above explanations that the everlasting motion
is a "natural behaviour of the universe", while the
motionlessness is a "state artificially forced",
introduces immensely vital philosophical implications.
Namely, they mean that it is just a matter of time, until
the "totaliztic science" finds some "war around" the
"blockade" that makes for the humanity impossible
to benefit from that "everlasting motion" of the universe,
and from the "unlimited amounts of free energy"
that this everlasting motion is able to supply to us.
In turn that finding of the "way around blockades"
is to open for the humanity an unlimited access
to any amounts of free energy. But there is a
"catch" with finding and with technical implementing
that "walking around the energy blockade". This
catch is indicated by findings of the "totaliztic
science" - means the science which is described
more comprehensively in item #C1 below on this
web page, and which researches the reality according
to the approach "from the cause to effect". Namely,
in order the "cause of everything" (means "God")
allows the humanity to acquire the access to such
unlimited amounts of free energy, firstly the humanity
must learn how to live and how to behave in the
"moral manner" - so that its immoral leaders and
politicians do NOT utilise later this unlimited amount
of energy for the continuation of present exploitation
of poorest nations, destruction of nature, and
for repetitive murdering with wars this part of the
population of Earth which escapes from their control.
Therefore, all signs on heaven and Earth indicate,
that the humanity gains the access to this unlimited
energy only after on the Earth is established officially
the "totaliztic science" described below in item #C1,
and also when this "totaliztic science" manages to
change principles on which work subsequent nations.
Unfortunately, because of the stubbornness with which
people refuse to get the message from moral lessons
served to them, there is a significant probability that
before such a new "moral order" is established on
the Earth, firstly a significant proportion of the
present humanity perhaps needs to be destroyed
with cataclysms - similar to these described in
item #M1 below on this web page, or described
in the web page named
seismograph.htm.
#B2.
An example of the simplest device for
"clean energy generation from self-renewable and incessant natural phenomena":
In order to reveal here, that actually there
are ways of tapping to this inexhaustible and
eternal motion of the universe, I am going to
describe below a simple technical device
which illustrates that such machines which
generate everlasting motion in fact are possible
to build. The device which I am presenting
here is already described on a number of
my publications, for example in item #G2
of the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
or in item #A2 of the web page named
boiler.htm.
But the most of descriptions of this device
was send to many universities from various
countries of the world, when in years 2005
to 2011, I fruitlessly tried to find a research
post which would allow me to research and
to develop prototypes of such devices for
generation of unlimited amounts of free energy.
This is because many universities, which at
that time were advertising posts for research
of new and unconventional sources of energy,
required that together with the application,
candidates supply also a proposal of research
intended for the completion after getting their
post. As a part of my research proposals for
these universities, I used to include also the
description of the device that I am going to
provide below in this item. I do not need to
add here, that unfortunately, all those my
job applications and efforts to find a research
position that would allow me to build this device,
turned out to be fruitless. But lately I discovered,
and described thoroughly in item #I1 from the
web page named
seismograph.htm,
that God intentionally organised those my offers
of research and development of the device described
here, to give an initial "warning" and a "fair chance"
for these countries and nations which in the future
are going to be punished by an "energy crisis" that
is to paralyse their entire life. This is because lately
it turned out, that exactly on the same principle
God also directed my sending-out of other proposals
of research and development of the "warning device
for the advanced detection of impending earthquakes",
so that my offers of building this warning device were
received by all these countries and cities which soon
afterwards were to be destroyed by powerful earthquakes -
about this I also wrote in the abovementioned item #I1
of the web page named
seismograph.htm.
So here is the presentation of the section from my
research proposals included into my job applications
posted to universities from many countries of the world,
which proposals contained the description of the device
for harvesting everlasting motion - I am quoting it from
one amongst my old job applications:
* * *
A further device the research and development
of which I would like to propose as an example
of my future research project, is an energy device
which I already opened for the public inventiveness
and experimentation by placing descriptions of
it in the "public domain" of my web pages.
This device illustrates perfectly, amongst others, the possibility of building an entirely new class of "devices for clean energy generation from self-renewable and incessant natural phenomena". Namely, let us assume for a moment that there exists an invisible kind of “wind” about the existence of which present science still does NOT know. If this (yet unknown and invisible) "wind" blows continually, steadily, and strongly for, let's say, one million years, then the "windmill" which such a "wind" would propel, would become a device which could be named with this extremely “unfashionable” now terminology of classical energy researchers, i.e. named the “perpetual motion device”. After all, this invisible and unknown to the present science “wind” would propel the “windmill” perpetually for countless number of years, while present science would NOT know why this device works and why it generates energy. Unfortunately, we also know that NO present scientist would ever have the courage to carry out any research on such a supposed “perpetual motion” device - simply because he would be “lynched” by his professional colleagues who believe in the statistic predictions called the “laws of thermodynamics” (which state that a “perpetual motion” device cannot be build). After all, with present traditions of “peer reviews” in the science, there is NO chance that any research paper on a “perpetual motion” device would obtain a favourable reference and could be published or presented on a scientific conference. Therefore, such a “windmill” which would work on invisible and yet unknown “wind” cannot be researched and developed by any paid scientist, as for such a scientist it could means the “professional suicide”. But the research on such “invisible and yet unknown winds” can easily be carried out and scientifically supervised by projects like my “public domain” research project - and this exactly what my project is doing. Then, when such a project is successful, the outcomes of it can be transferred to the domain of official science. Interestingly, the above example of a “windmill” on invisible and yet unknown “wind” is NOT as purely hypothetical as it may sound. Various sciences already know numerous "winds" that "blow" continually and steadily for millions of years. To indicate here some examples of such "winds", these include: the rotation of our planet Earth, the motion of Moon around the Earth, the magnetic field of the Earth, waves of a "cosmic noise", temperature differences between surface of the Earth and e.g. the absolute zero of cosmic space or coolness of upper atmosphere, various behaviours of elementary particles, a reversal of friction, and many more. The only problem is that so-far no-one had the courage (and knowledge and motivation) to develop principles and devices with the use of which energy could be harvested from such incessant natural phenomena. But the human inventiveness has no limits. Thus, for each such a phenomenon a principle can be invented, which would generate energy or everlasting mechanical motion from it. The only barrier is that people (and scientists) need to firstly overcome the psychological barrier which obstruct their thinking and which keeps them “looking backward” for principles and for phenomena, instead of “looking forward” into the future. So let us explain here a simple example how we could generate e.g. “perpetual rotational motion” from one of such incessant and invisible "winds" - i.e. from the gravity field and the Earth’s rotations. If, for example, we construct a mechanical "flywheel", which meets following technically easy-to-fulfil conditions: (1) it has the so-called "momentum of inertia" larger than its "friction torque", (2) it is perfectly balanced - so that the gravitational field of the Earth does NOT influence its angular orientation, and (3) it is so assembled in a given location that the axis of rotation of this flywheel is exactly parallel to the axis of the Earth’s rotation; then such a flywheel should create an everlasting motion in relationship to the Earth, with the speed of one rotation per day (or more strictly, this flywheel would remain motionless in relationship to our solar system, while the Earth would rotate around it once per each day). So such a flywheel - if constructed and provided with an appropriate gearbox linked to a pointer, could prove empirically that a “forward looking” synthesis is able to develop principles of operation which allow the harvesting of motion and energy from the rotational motion of our planet. In turn, when further such “incessant natural phenomena” (or invisible “winds”) are identified and principles are developed which allow the generation of clean energy from them, this would have enormous implications for all areas of science and technology. For example, it would provide the society with a rather illustrative example that vast amounts of energy can be generated without causing any pollution. It would also change our entire civilisation, as it would pave the way for the development of various principles that would allow to draw free clean energy and everlasting motion from various perpetual "winds". In turn implementation of these principles would allow the humanity to generate vast amounts of energy without any consumption of fossil or nuclear fuels (and thus also without causing pollution) from phenomena for which currently no scientist have an inspiring example nor courage to investigate because for innovative ideas in energy technologies the present tradition orders us to rather “look into the past” instead of “looking into the future”.
Part #C:
What irrational reasons are making until today impossible for
the humanity to get around the building of "energy-generating
devices of telekinetics":
#C1.
How to eliminate the progress-obstructing "monopole for knowledge"
of the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date, and how through the priori
breaking this monopole with the creation of the new "totaliztic science"
it becomes possible to undertake the development of safe and beneficial
for people "devices of telekinetics":
From the lessons of economics, as well as
from everyday lives, we all know perfectly
well, that "monopoles" are extremely detrimental
for the humanity. For example, only in New
Zealand where "everyone knows everyone",
because of the tendency of its population
(and thus also its politicians) to form monopoles
in every possible area, from the country
which before the introduction of present
monopoles enjoyed one of the highest
standards of living in the world, within just
around 20 years since it unleashed monopoles
from control, turned out to be a country which
has one amongst the lowest standards of living
in the developed world.
In spite of this common knowledge that "monopoles"
are seeds and the lair of social evil, in the most
vital matter such as the development of progress
and knowledge, the humanity tolerates the "monopole
for knowledge" of the present "atheistic orthodox
science". In turn this science jealously guards this
its monopole and do NOT give voice to anyone who
can take it away. On the other hand, the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
described above, created scientific and philosophical
foundations for establishing a completely "competitive"
science, which in item #A2.6 of the web page named
totalizm.htm
is called the "totaliztic science".
This newly-born "totaliztic science" explains to
everyone in item #A2.6 of the web page named
totalizm.htm,
that the complete and balanced knowledge
can be accumulated only if every topic is researched
from at least two opposite points of view.
Such a two-directional approach to research is well
illustrated in abovementioned item #A2.6 with
examples that use, amongst others, the analogy
of looking at a landscape, when one passes the
"route to" and the "route from". Namely, when a
landscape is watched while we drive in one direction
only, e.g. "to", then we see only a half of views
through which we are driving. The second half
remains hidden from us, because in order to
see it, we need to look at it from a completely
opposite direction. Thus, only after looking at
the same landscape during the "route to" and
then during the "route from", we receive a full
and balanced knowledge of what along this road
is located. Exactly the same happens with scientific
research. Every problem can be researched with
at least two different philosophical approaches,
namely research "from the effect to causes",
or research "from causes to effects". Unfortunately,
the present "atheistic orthodox science" researches
everything exclusively from the approach "from
effects to causes". After all, "it assumes in advance"
that the "cause of everything", means "God", does
NOT exist at all. Therefore, in order the humanity
received a full and balanced picture of the reality,
it is necessary to create a "competition" for the
present "atheistic orthodox science", in the form
of a completely new "totaliztic science" which is
founded on the formal scientific proof of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
that "God does exist", and thus which researches
everything from the opposite to that of the current
science approach "from the cause to effects" (means
"from God" to the "reality which surround us").
This new "totaliztic science" has a completely
opposite approach to accumulation of knowledge
than the to-date "atheistic orthodox science".
After all, when the to-date orthodox science researches
everything according to the philosophical approach
called "a posteriori" - means "from
effects to the cause", this newly-born "totaliztic
science" researches everything from the philosophical
approach called "a priori" - means "from
the cause to effects". In the result, already until
now this newly-born "totaliztic science" acting completely
without any financing for its research, and continuously
being exposed to the multitude of persecutions and
bans from the "atheistic orthodox science", it still already
managed for example to formally prove that "God
does exist" (this formal scientific proof for the
existence of God is presented e.g. in item #G2 of
the totaliztic web page named
god_proof.htm),
and also managed to prove that "telekinetic 'free
energy devices' can be build, while after being
completed they are able to save our civilisation
from the 'death by lack of energy' ".
Opposite to the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date,
which only egoistically takes care of its own
interests, while completely neglects the good
of the humanity which it supposed to serve,
the newly-born "totaliztic science" as its goals
selected the service to "morality, truth, knowledge,
progress, and the humanity". This is because
of these goals, that the "totaliztic science"
states that the old "atheistic orthodox science"
must NOT be replaced by the new
"totaliztic science", but only for this old science
we need to create a competition in the
form of the new "totaliztic science", and then
this "competition" should be maintained by
similar financing and promotion of both these
sciences simultaneously. The point is, that
if an old "monopole for knowledge" is replaced
by a new "monopole for knowledge", with the
elapse of time would happen exactly the same
as it typically happens when an old corrupted
government is replaced by a new government -
namely the new also with the elapse of time
gets corrupted. Therefore, in the vital interest
of the humanity lies NOT only to establish as
soon as possible and begin to finance the new
"totaliztic science" that is based on the scientific
foundations of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and on the philosophical foundations of the
philosophy of totalizm,
but also during the creation of that new science
to still make sure that the old "atheistic orthodox
science" still existed and operated - only that
finally it has a "scientific competition" in the result
of which both sciences started to mutually "watch
hands of each other", mutually check, verify, and
correct each other, and continually challenge
each other's scientific findings (all this in turn
would serve for the good of morality, truth,
knowledge, progress of development of the humanity).
After the formal creation of the new "totaliztic science",
one of the first research projects of this new science
should be the research and development of "energy-generating
devices of telekinetics" described on this web page.
Only when the humanity enters finally the period of
possession of such devices, becomes possible to
avoid further catastrophes of the kind of nuclear
pollutions of the Earth and the humanity, such as
this from Chernobyl or from Fukushima in Japan
(as this is described in item #M1 near the end of
this web page).
Of course, "telekinetics" is not only interested in
the "energy-generating devices of free energy",
but also in a whole range of other devices, the
research of which I already initiated and currently
continue - for example in
Oscillatory Chambers of all three generations,
telekinetic vehicles,
and even in
time vehicles.
Therefore, when the new "totaliztic science" already
masters and implements for the use of the humanity
the "telekinetic devices of free energy" described on
this web page, the turn comes for the research and
development of these further devices of the future.
Thus, for researchers of this new "totaliztic science"
there will be enough work for many generations to come.
So it really is worth that societies and mass media force
their reluctant governments and complacent educational
institutions for establishing the new "totaliztic science" -
preferably still during my lifetime (so that it would be me
who gives to it the correct initial direction and the right
intellectual and philosophical climate). It is also worth
already at present to start fight actively and perseveringly
to give to that science the official status, own schools
and universities, own scientific journals, and the required
governmental financing which would be completely
independent from all monopolistic institutions of the
old orthodox science. I personally estimate, that a
fast establishing of such new "totaliztic science" in
any country, would bring equally far-reaching consequences
for that country and for that nation, as historically for Poland
had the establishing of the "National Educational Commission"
(in Polish called the "Narodowa Komisja Edukacyjna"), which
by being established before Poland went through the partition
to three different super-powers, after many years still managed
to cause that the renew Poland was later restored from these
three separate countries.
Part #D:
Design and main components of devices of telekinetics
explained on examples of telekinetic influenzmaschines:
#D1.
Main components of telekinetic influenzmaschines:
In the sense of principles involved in their
operation, telekinetic influenzmaschines
are actually devices composed of three
mutually cooperating components. Let us
discuss here separately each one amongst
these three main components.
1.
Electrostatic motor. It is the first component
of the telekinetic influenzmaschines. The electrostatic
motor works on principles of electrostatic influence.
Means, this motor uses principles of operation that
are exact reversals of principles utilised in either
the Töpler electrostatic machine, or in the electrostatic
Wimshurst electrostatic machine. As the reader
probably knows, in principles of electricity the motors
and the generators are mutually reversible. This
means that principles applied in every electric motor
can be reversed so that they produce a generator
of electricity. Also principles of every electricity
generator can be so reversed that they produce
an electric motor. This reversibility applies to
principles utilised in the Töpler and the Wimshurst
electrostatic machines.
2.
Telekinetic cell. This one is the second vital
component of telekinetic influenzmaschines. The
telekinetic cell is described relatively well in item
#C1 of the web page named
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy,
and also on a separate web page named
fe_cell.htm - about the approach to research and development of telekinetic cells.
The telekinetic cell generates free electricity which
is then used for sustaining the motion of the electrostatic
motor.
3.
Analogous controller of rotational speed of discs
(dynamo-motor). One amongst significant
problems of electricity generation and correct
operation of devices of telekinetics is the problem
of maintaining a constant rotational velocity of
the rotating discs (in the Thesta-Distatica this velocity
is kept continually at the value of 60 rotations per
minute). After all, from the precision of this constant
velocity depends the frequency of the current that
is generated by the device. In order to solve this
problem special "analogous controller of rotational
speed of discs" must be added to the design of our
electrostatic motor. This controller is obtained through
the mechanical linking of the electrostatic motor that
is used as the main component of the telekinetic
influenzmaschine, with a small spindle which propels
a miniature "dynamo-motor". The "dynamo-motor"
has an "opposite" electrical conenction to the electrostic
motor. This means that it is connection to the electrostatic
motor in the so-called "positive feedback loop".
All three above components, means the
(1) electrostatic motor, (2) the telekinetic cell, and
(3) the analogous controller of rotational speed of
discs, together form a telekinetic influenzmaschine
which not only produces a visible mechanical
motion without the need for any energy supply,
but also produces a significant surplus of free
electricity which later can be supplied to other
electrical appliances in order to power them.
At this point we should explain names assigned
here to the machines of telekinetics.
After all in literature and also in Internet these
machines are named with the use of several
different names. For example Methernitha assigned
a different name to each of these machines. Thus
names Thesta-Distatica and Testatica
are of these machines used by Methernitha. In turn
Bela Brosan, and after him also probably Vene,
used a different name influenz-machines
for his machines. I adopted his name to honour
his accomplishments, and I use it widely in my
publications. Only that I added a qualifying word
"telekinetic" (this is where the name telekinetic
influenzmaschines, that I frequently use on this
web page, comes from). Still another group of researchers
of these machines calls them the M-L converter.
Many investigators call them simply generators
of free energy. In turn I believe that in sciences
they should carry the general name "machines of
telekinetics". But all the above names in fact refer
to one and the same kind of machines - described
on this web page.
Fig. #D1: The "Thesta-Distatica" from the Swiss
religious commune Methernitha, means two-disc
"telekinetic influenzmaschine". This one is the most
advanced
free energy device
which was build on the Earth so-far, which
actually works, and which produces an
abundance of free energy. A relatively full
description of this device is presented in
item #D1 of the web page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy.
Please notice that Methernitha has also
two smaller such devices working on the
same principle, which use a single disk
and which are called "Testatica".
(The above photograph originates from monograph
[1/4]
where it is shown on Figure K4.)
* * *
The free energy device from "Fig. #D1"
above (or from Figure K4 in monograph [1/4])
is called Thesta-Distatica.
It belongs to general category of so-called
"telekinetic influenzmaschines". The word
"influenzmaschines" originates from the
German language. It designates a whole
class of machines, which utilise the phenomenon
of electrostatic induction in their operation.
This phenomenon is called "influenz" in
German. (One needs to distinguish between
the phenomenon of "influenz", and other
phenomena that also can be utilised in
various electrostatic machines. For example
the Van de Graaff Generator utilises the
phenomenon of "friction".) Historic examples
of influenzmaschines include the Töpler
electrostatic machine with a single disk,
or the Wimshurst electrostatic
machine with two disks. In turn "telekinetic
influenzmaschines" are more advanced
versions of influenzmaschines, which for
their operation utilize additionally the phenomenon
called the Telekinetic Effect. (Means they
utilize telekinesis in addition to effects of
electrostatic influence.)
Principles of operation and design of telekinetic
influenzmaschines are described in details in
subsection K2.3 from volume 10 of monograph
[1/4].
These principles are also briefly summarised
on the web page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy.
Therefore here these principles are not going
to be discussed. After all, this web page is aimed
at explaining how to build this machine, not how
it operates.
The telekinetic influenzmaschine "Thesta Distatica"
shown above was build by the Swiss Religious
Community calling itself the Methernitha.
The Thesta-Distatica generates around 3 kW AC
50 Hz electrical energy at around 600 Volt. From
the operational point of view, it is actually an "AC
motor" operating on principles of electrostatic influence.
This motor runs because free electrical energy
is supplied into it by a "telekinetic cell" that is embedded
into its design. (The design and operation of such
a telekinetic cell is summarised in item #C1 of the
web page named
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy,
while discussed in more details on a separate web page
fe_cell.htm - about telekinetic cells.)
The first two such telekinetic influenzmaschines called
"Testatica" (with single disks, based on principles of the
Töpler machine) were build NOT to produce free electricity,
but to produce free mechanical motion. The goal of their
construction was to illustrate visually to highly sceptical
people and to orthodox scientists, that because these
machines can produce physical motion without any
form of energy supply, they actually prove that the
building of perpetual motion machines (also
called "perpetual motion") is really possible.
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site. For this, it suffices to click
on this illustration. Furthermore, most of the internet browsers that you may
use, including the popular "Internet Explorer",
allow also to download each illustration
to your own computer, where it can be looked at, reduced or enlarged to the
size that you may want, or printed with your own graphical software.
If you wish to shift
a given Figure (i.e. a photograph or a drawing),
means to move it into another part of the screen
where you are just reading a description of it,
you need to do as follows: (1) click on it to make it appear
in another window, (2) the "downsize" this another
window (with a given photograph or drawing) through
"grabbing" its right-bottom corner with your mouse
and then dragging this corner upwards-left to receive
the size of this different window that you wish to have
(notice that since you downsize a first such a Figure,
all next Figures clicked on will appear already
downsized - unless you enlarge them in the reversed manner),
and then (3) drag this another window with the picture
that you wish to relocate to the area of this web page where
you wish to look at it (to move it, you just grab it with
your mouse by the blue stripe on the top of it).
Notice also that if you scroll (with scroll bars) the
text of the page when you read it, this another window
(with the drawing) will disappear. In order to return it
into the new position, you need to click on its "icon"
(i.e. on the "program's button" from the taskbar) in
the lowest part of the screen.
Part #E:
How to start the completion of a telekinetic influenzmaschine:
#E1.
Main stages of development of telekinetic influenzmaschine:
The simplest manner of building a telekinetic
influenzmaschine boils down to constructing
firstly, and then gradually testing them independently,
all three its basic components described previously
in item #D1 of this web page. Then these three
components need to be so integrated with each
other, that they form a complete working telekinetic
influenzmaschine. Let us discuss now what this
building and independent testing of three
basic components is all about:
1.
Construction of the "electrostatic motor for alternating
current". From this step we need to start the
building of our telekinetic influenzmaschine. Such
an "electrostatic motor for alternating current" must
work on principles of electrostatic influence. This
means that the motor needs to be simply a reversal
of either the Töpler electrostatic machine, or the
Wimshurst electrostatic machine. Actually such
a motor could be purchased almost ready made,
as many countries, including Poland, offer brand
new, two-disk Winshurst electrostatic machines for
sale in shops. These ready-made machines look
as it is shown in "Fig. #E1" below (or Figure 11 in
monograph
[6]).
There is, however, a small problem with such factory-made
machines. Namely the Töpler and the Wimshurst
machines both work as electrostatic generators.
This means that they produce static electricity while
consuming mechanical motion. To convert them
into influence motors, it is necessary to reverse
their principles of operation. So they must be able
to produce motion when their capacitors are
supplied with AC electricity of 50 Hz. Furthermore,
in order they later are able to work effectively as
telekinetic infuenzmaschines, they must fulfil a whole
array of additional design requirements. For example,
for practical reasons it is desirable that their rotational
velocity was constant and amounted to 60 revolution
per minute. This is because such a rotational velocity
can later be easily controlled, as its speed boils down
to 1 rotation of the disc per second. In turn the machine
generates AC electricity of frequency 50 Hz for Europe,
(or 60 Hz for America), the number of its electrodes
must be equal to the local frequency of the electricity
(i.e. 50 electrodes in Europe, while 60 electrodes in
Americas). In this way the number of electrodes on
its discs multiplied by the rotational velocity of these
discs provides e.g. 50 Hz in impulses for the Europe.
Therefore, although it is good to have at hand a new
(purchased) machine of Töpler or Wimshurst as a
model for experimenting and for designing, still in
order to build the telekinetic influenzmaschine we
need to design our own completely new "electrostatic
AC motor", starting the design of it from a very beginning.
2.
Construction of the "telekinetic cell". After we have
such an "electrostatic AC motor" working, we need to
use one induction head (brush) from it as a pulser for
the "telekinetic cell". Means we need to catch the 50 Hz
electric impulses that this motor generates, with the
brush marked "ho" on illustrations "Fig. #D2" and
"Fig. #D3" in the web page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy
(i.e. on Figures K5 and K6 from monograph [1/4]).
Then we feed these impulses to the entry of a separate
"telekinetic cell" that we integrate with our motor.
These impulses are going to make our telekinetic
cell work. So we can feed now the output from this
telekinetic cell back into the capacitors of our
electrostatic motor. In this way we receive a duplex
operation of the resultant device, composed of the
electrostatic motor, and the telekinetic cell. In this
duplex operation the rotation of discs of the electrostatic
motor produces electric impulses which induce the
operation of the telekinetic cell, in turn the telekinetic
cell generates electricity which sustains the operation
of the electrostatic motor. So the resultant device is
going to operate exactly the same as does the "Thesta
Distatica" shown previously in "Fig. #D1" (or Figure
K4 in monograph [1/4]). (This practically means that
the description that I am providing here for my telekinetic
influenzmaschines is also a description of the true
operation of the "Thesta Distatica" constructed by the
Swiss religious community "Methernitha".) Our device
is to produce a small but visible "perpetual motion",
plus plenty of free electricity, the excess of which can
be utilised by us for a free supply of other electrical
appliances into electrical power.
3.
Construction of the "analogous controller for rotational
speed of discs". If we build our telekinetic influenzmaschine
in such a manner that it does NOT have such a controller,
then the rotational velocity of it (and thus also the frequency
of the current that it generates) become erratic and strongly
dependent on the outside environmental conditions.
For example, in dry hot days it will rotate fast, while in
other days - slow. Therefore to the electrical circuitry of
this machine we need to add a small like "dynamo" (or
more strictly a "dynamo-motor") which is also going to
work as a small electrical motor. This "dynamo-motor"
we need to link via a belt transmission with rotations of
disks of our machine. In turn the electrical current which
it is going to generate we need to connect to the current
that is generated by our telekinetic influenzmaschine. This
connection we need to make on a "contradictive" principle
(means with the so-called "positive feedback"). So when
the external conditions are such that they cause discs of
our machine to slow down and thus generate current of
less than 50 HZ frequency, then this "dynamo-motor"
will start to work like a "motor" and it is to "speed up"
rotational velocities of disks to the required velocity. In
turn when the external environmental conditions cause
that discs of our machine rotate too fast to generate the
current of the 50 Hz frequency, then this "dynamo-motor"
begins to work as a "dynamo", means it begins to consume
mechanical motion and to produce the electrical current.
This in turn is going to "hold back" the discs to a required
rotational velocity.
Fig. #E1: Wimshurst electrostatic machine.
It represents a starting point for constructing
"telekinetic influenzmaschines", means for
constructing devices of telekinetics the first
working prototypes of which already were
constructed on the Earth.
In 1989 I completed extensive research on so-called "free energy devices".
These devices utilise the reversal of friction for generating free electricity.
In the same way as friction spontaneously converts motion into heat,
free energy devices spontaneously convert thermal energy contained
in the environment into motion of electrons in a wire. Thus they
cool down the environment, while simultaneously they generate electricity
literally for free - means without any need for supplying them into fuel or
into any other form of energy. I invented my own free energy device,
which in volume 10 of my monograph [1/4] is described under the name
"telekinetic cell". Principles employed in the operation of this
telekinetic cell are explained on my web pages on
"free energy"
accessible via the Menu. I also worked out principles of operation
for another entire class of free energy devices, which carry the
general name "telekinetic influenzmaschines" (for example, the famous
Thesta-Distatica from Switzerland, which at the moment is the most
successful free energy device on our planet, belongs to this class
of telekinetic influenzmaschines).
Then I decided to build these devices. However, as soon as I completed
their detailed designs and purchased components, by a strange "coincident"
I lost my university job (in 1990). This loss of lecturing job at the university,
make completely impossible any attempt at the completion of free energy
devices that I invented. After all, in such a situation, the finding of
a next job and survival became the first priority.
The photograph above
shows me holding in hands the brand new Wimshurst electrostatic machine,
which is the main component for constructing telekinetic influenzmaschines.
Just behind my back, at the height of my shoulder blades, a cluster of
buildings from the university campus is visible in which I worked at that
time. I hoped to complete in there a telekinetic influenzmaschine - unfortunately
in 1990 I lost my lecturing job before I managed to accomplish this goal.
Please notice that principles of operation and design of telekinetic batteries
of my invention, as well as telekinetic influenzmaschines (means the
another class of free energy devices into which the famous Thesta
Distatica from Switzerland belongs), is elaborated in details on my other
web page which, amongst others, can be viewed at the following addresses:
free_energy.htm, and
fe_cell.htm.
#E2.
At the moment of making the decision about starting the construction of the telekinetic influenzmaschine
it is worth to know that the task of accomplishing this device is the "most difficult technical task of the world",
although simultaneously it is a task to be completed by a single ambitious hobbyist:
An attempt to build the telekinetic influenzmaschine
is an enormously ambitious task. Actually in present
situation on the Earth this is the most difficult task
in the world. After all, in order to accomplish a
success, one needs to overcome a whole series
of various obstacles. For example, in oneself
the builder must overcome a kind of curse of
present civilisation, which is the custom of sitting
on ones back side (or on "own hands"), watching
television, eating sandwiches, and doing NOTHING
to improve the situation of others and one's own.
In oneself also overcome must be the philosophically
erroneous belief, which is imposed onto all of us
by present science and education, and which
claims that such machines cannot be build at all.
Also overcome must be the standard thinking
habits and one needs to thing in a manner
called the "lateral thinking". In addition to all these,
the construction of these machines must be done
with correct moral motivations, described in part
#K of this web page, which must be aimed at the
true good of our civilisation, and which must be
manifested by avoiding the secrecy over anything.
All this must be complemented with "down to earth"
thinking, excellent and wide knowledge, and the
ability to find on one's own the information that one
requires. The only favourable circumstance in all
of this is that telekinetic influenzmaschines can be
constructed just by an individual hobbyist alone in
a typically equipped home workshop or garage.
So the builder of these machines does NOT need
any large developmental team nor expensively
equipped laboratory. Also the favourable in this
construction is that
God
is very interested in the development of this device
and is going to supervise every single step we take
on the path to realize this extraordinary device.
Actually, while building this device one becomes
a builder sponsored directly by God Himself.
Because the building this machine is actually the
most difficult task in the world that is accomplishable
by a single person, on the attempts of constructing
this device "broke their teeth" numerous people.
Only on this web page in item #J2 is explained
that the defeat in attempts to build this device
experienced Paul Baumann himself together with
his large developmental team (and this in spite that
that had for templates three already working prototypes
of such machines), and probably also Nitschel himself
that worked under the name "Vene" (and this in spite
that he previously constructed three such working
machines). I know also about several further people
who were defeated in their attempts of constructing
a telekinetic influenzmaschine, but there is NO need
to indicate here all of them.
Fig. #E2: One amongst a whole series of prototypes
of machines constructed in various countries of the
world, which tried top duplicate the design of telekinetic
influenzmaschine called "Thesta-Distatica" and build
by the Swiss religious commune Methernitha.
The above two-disk "telekinetic influenzmaschine"
was constructed by the Swiss group called "Vene"
from the nearest to Methernitha town Thun. However,
similarly like many other attempts of this kind,
the above machine never was working. Experts
would claim that most clearly the builder of this
machine was lacking the technical expertise and
manufacturing power that were in disposal of
the developmental team from Methernitha. But
I would state, that for reasons described below
in item #K1,
God
just refused to allow to construct this machine without
priori fulfilment of conditions explained in item #K2
of this web page. After all, even the developmental
team from Methernitha failed in its efforts to build the
fourth (gigantic) technical version of their telekinetic
influenzmaschines, in spite that it had to its disposal
this entire technical expertise and three previously
constructed (and working) prototypes of these machines.
Part #F:
Construction of the "electrostatic motor for alternating
current" - means the research and development of the
first basic component of the telekinetic influenzmaschine:
#F1.
Construction of the reversible version of the
electrostatic machine:
Jak to wyjaśniłem w punkcie #J3 tej strony,
w 1990 roku - czyli w czasach kiedy ciągle
jeszcze miałem pracę wykładowcy uniwersyteckiego,
zupełnie na poważnie przygotowywałem
wówczas podjęcie w Nowej Zelandii seryjnej
produkcji opisywanych tutaj telekinetycznych
influenzmaschine. Wszakże wiedziałem wówczas
już dokładnie jaka jest zasada działania owych
telekinetycznych influenzmaschine. Na
uniwersytecie miałem też dostęp do urządzeń
pomiarowych i do laboratorium badawczego
w których zamierzałem zmontować razem
i dopracować w szczegółach prototyp
produkcyjny owej potrzebnej ludzkości
maszyny. Chociaż więc po mojej
utracie w 1990 roku pracy wykładowcy owego uniwersytetu
zmuszony zostałem zrezygnować z tamtych
planów, plany te nadal istnieją i nadal ich
najważniejsze szczegóły jestem teraz w stanie
zrekonstruować i opublikować. Ponieważ
zaś były one realistyczne, wykonalne przez
niemal każdego, oraz naukowo zoptymalizowane
pod względem łatwości ich urzeczywistnienia,
każdy kto nosi się z zamiarem zbudowania
tej maszyny ma największą szansę sukcesu
jeśli będzie postępował zgodnie z tamtymi
moimi planami. Dlatego postulując tutaj
zbudowanie "elektrostatycznego silnika na
prąd zmienny" w ramach pierwszej fazy budowy
telekinetycznej influenzmaschine, faktycznie
nawracam do tamtych swoich starych planów
i wyjaśniam tutaj ich szczegóły.
Zbudowanie "elektrostatycznego silnika na prąd
zmienny" w ramach pierwszej fazy budowy
telekinetycznej influenzmaschine faktycznie
sprowadza się do wykonania tzw. "modelu Dra Pająka"
maszyny elektrostatycznej Wimshursta. (Nazwa
tego modelu wywodzi się z czasów kiedy negocjowałem
podjęcie jego seryjnej produkcji z fabryką w Nysie.
Inżynierowie owej fabryki jego dokumentację i opisy
nazywali wówczas właśnie "modelem Dra Pająka".
Potem ta nazwa do niego już przylgnęła i była
używana w moich dalszych publikacjach.) Model
ten zaprojektowałem jeszcze w 1990 roku na
uniwersytecie, w czasach kiedy zabierałem się
za podjęcie budowy telekinetycznej influenzmaschine.
Esencja owego "modelu Dra Pająka" sprowadza
się do tego, że stanowił on odwracalną wersję
maszyny elektrostatycznej Wimshursta, która
została tak zaprojektowana, aby mogła pracować
zarówno jako elektrostatyczny generator elektryczności
(czyli jako maszyna Wimshursta) jak również jako
silnik elektrostatyczny (tj. jako podstawowy podzespół
telekinetycznych influenzmaschines). Mianowicie,
ów "model Dra Pająka" miał w sobie wszystkie elementy
zarówno maszyn elektrostatycznych, jak i silników
elektrostatycznych. Dlatego był bardzo łatwy do
testowania i do dopracowywania jego szczegółów.
Kiedy miał on pracować jako maszyna
Wimshursta, jego tarcze napędzane były ręcznie
krobką, podczas gdy generowany przez niego
ładunek elektryczny mógł być zbierany z jego
terminala wyjściowego. Aby zaś przetransformować
go w silnik elektrostatyczny, wystarczyło zdjąć pasek
który łączył jego korbkę z tarczami, dostarczyć
prąd elektryczny do jego terminala wyjściowego,
oraz zakręcić wstępnie jedną z jego tarcz. Jego
tarcze następnie obracały się już same napędzane
dostarczanym do niego prądem elektrycznym.
Ów "model Dra Pająka" stanowił więc już gotowy
pozespół bazowy dla telekinetycznej influenzmaschine.
Moim planem było wówczas, że zlecę polskiej
fabryce maszyn elektrostatycznych w Nysie
seryjną produkcję owego "modelu Pająka".
(W owym czasie adres tamtej fabryki był jak
następuje: Fabryka Pomocy Naukowych w Nysie,
ul. Słowiańska 43, 48 300 Nysa, Poland; Tel: 2491.)
Po zaimportowaniu zaś do Nowej Zelandii serii
maszyn owego "modelu Dra Pająka" domontuję
do nich jedynie "baterię telekinetyczną" i "sterownik
prędkości tarcz", oraz zintegruję wszystkie części
w jedną pracującą całość. Otrzymane zaś w ten
sposób telekinetyczne influenzmaschines będę
upowszechniał (sprzedawał) po świecie jako gotowe
telekinetyczne generatory darmowej energii.
W ramach realizacji owego planu zdołałem nawet
przekonać óczesną dyrekcję fabryki w Nysie do
podjęcia seryjnej produkcji "modelu Pająka".
Niestety, moja następna utrata pracy na
uniwersytecie, bezrobocie, oraz konieczność
tułaczki po świecie "za chlebem" zrujnowały tamte plany.
The "model of Dr Pajak" is described relatively
well in subsection 5.4 from the Polish monograph
[6/2].
It is also explained in subsection K2.3.4 from
volume 10 of monograph
[1/4] -
only that in this [1/4] it is NOT called anymore
the "model of Dr Pajak". But because the reader
may not have the access to these monographs
[6/2] or [1/4] or is unable to understand these
descriptions, I am going to briefly explain this
model here. So the reader just needs to implement
the first stage of building the telekinetic influenzmaschine
by building for himself just such a "model of Dr
Pajak".
#F2.
Najważniejsze szczegóły konstrukcyjne odwracalnej wersji
maszyny elektrostatycznej zwanej "modelem Dra Pająka",
wraz z uzasadnienieniami takiego a nie innego ich zaprojektowania:
Zanim też się przystąpi do realizacji tego projektu najpierw wykonać należy pełną dokumentację konstrukcyjną tej maszyny i upewnić się, że pod względem wymiarowym i działaniowym wszystko jest sprawdzone i poprawne. W dokumentacji tej przewidzieć i rozrysować powinno się współdziałanie, położenie, wymiary, konstrukcję, sposób zamontowania, oraz sposób późniejszego regulowania i udoskonalania wszelkich elementów konstrukcyjnych jakie wymagane będą w budowanym przez siebie telekinetycznym agregacie prądotwórczym. Szczególnie dobrze w dokumentacji tej powinno się rozpracować następujące aspekty:
5A. Konstrukcję, wymiary i wzajemne rozmieszczenie wszystkich części budowanego ageregatu. Przykładowo dla ułatwienia późniejszych udoskonaleń obie tarcze agregatu powinny posiadać co najmniej średnicę 55 cm, tj. nie mniejszą niż średnica tarcz w Thesta-Distatica (w maszynie Wimshursta V5 43 posiadają one tylko średnicę 250 mm). Zasada jest przy tym, że im większa jest maszyna i jej tarcze, tym łatwiej przyjdzie potem wprowadzać do niej poprawki i udoskonalenia. Jednak po przekroczeniu przez średnice tarcz wartości około 1 m, maszyna staje się już zbyt ciężka i nieporęczna.
5B. Przy budowie maszyny z dwoma tarczami - wymuszanie przeciwbieżnego ruchu obu tarcz. Wymuszenie to najlepiej uzyskać przez pojedyńczy pasek który jednocześnie napędza wrzecionko (Ts) - jak to pokazano na rysunku K5 (e). Pamiętać przy tym należy o mechaniźmie napinania tego pasa. Ponadto rekomendowałbym, aby wrzecionko (Ts) umieszczone było ponad obu tarczami, nie zaś poniżej nich - jak to ma miejsce w Thesta-Distatica. Powodem jest, że w dalszych etapach prac rozwojowych wrzecionko to, oraz współpracujący z nim dynamo-motor (Dm) wymagały będą najróżniejszych przeróbek i udoskonaleń, a także nieustannego regulowania. Stąd powinien istnieć łatwy dostęp do wrzecionka i dynamo-motoru, tak aby nie było konieczne odmontowywanie obu tarcz za każdym razem kiedy trzeba dostać się do wrzecionka. (W Thesta-Distatica dostęp ten jest bardzo utrudniony.) Z kolei umieszczenie wrzecionka u góry agregatu nakłada wymóg aby głowica (ho) oraz np. magnesy (Mo) i (M) znajdowały się u dołu tarcz.
Wrzecionko (Ts) będzie utrzymywało 6 lub 8 magnesów, współpracujących z elektrodami obu tarcz oraz z dynamo-motorem. Stąd obroty tego wrzecionka powinny zostać tak dobrane, aby umożliwiały one współpracę indywidualnych magnesów z indywidualnymi elektrodami. To zaś oznacza, że przełożenie prędkości pomiędzy wirującymi tarczami i wrzecionkiem powinno być odpowiednio 1:8 albo też 1:6. Gotowe rozwiązanie dla tego wrzecionka oraz współpracującego z nim dynamo-motoru uzyskać można ze starych motocykli, np. WFM. (Ich dynamo budowane było wszakże jako wirująca tarcza z ośmioma magnesami współpracująca z cewkami dynama.)
5C. Napęd i rozruch tarcz. Podczas prób, tarcze często będą musiały być napędzane. Należy więc przewidzieć i rozwiązać sposób tego napędzania - albo za pomocą korbki, albo małego silniczka elektrycznego (zasilanego z sieci). W przypadku rozwiązania z korbką, napęd przykładowo podawany może być tylko na przednią tarczę za pośrednictwem pojedyńczego (zrzucalnego) paska i korbki. Korbka zaopatrzona powinna być w balast przeciwwagowy, jaki zabezpieczy jej wyważone wirowanie inercyjne po zaprzestaniu jej napędzania ręką. Z przedniej tarczy na tylną napęd ten przekazywany będzie za pośrednictwem przeciwbieżnej przekładni pasowej opisanej już w punkcie 5B.
5D. Zasadę minimalizowania oporów ruchu poprzez zastosowanie łożysk kulkowych (tj. zamiast łożysk ślizgowych stosowanych w tradycyjnych maszynie Wimshursta, np. maszynie V5 43). Na łożyskach tych powinny być osadzone wszystkie części wirujące (tj. obie tarcze, wrzecionko (Ts), koła pasowe, oraz ewentualna korbka). Rozwiązania techniczne i gotowe podzespoły jakie tu mogą zostać użyte daje się łatwo podpatrzeć i zaadoptować z konstrukcji rowerów.
5E. Liczbę elektrod (e). Liczba ta powinna być podzielna przez 8 (tj. przez ilość pozycji kątowych głowic), zaś po pomnożeniu jej przez szybkość obrotową tarcz (n) powinna dać częstotliwść roboczą baterii telekinetycznej (R) wbudowanej w tą maszynę, równą częstotliwości prądu z sieci, tj. f=e•n=50 [Hz]. Stąd dla średnicy obu tarcz d=55 cm (najłatwiej i najbezpieczniej wykonywanych z przeźroczystego pleksiglasu), najlepiej aby uzyskały one po 48 drabinkowatych elektrod rozmieszczonych równomiernie na ich obwodzie (zamiast po 30 elektrod istniejących w maszynie V5 43). Każda z tych elektrod posiadałaby wtedy długość około 190 mm. Knoby stykowe (w kształcie pinesek) osadzone powinny być po wewnętrznej, osiowej stronie elektrod (a nie jak w V5 43 po ich zewnętrznej stronie).
5F. Bezpieczeństwo eksperymentującego i obserwatorów. Już na etapie projektowania należy zwrócić uwagę, aby budowana maszyna była bezpieczna podczas eksperymentowania. Należy wszakże pamiętać, że wytwarzane na niej napięcie czasami przekroczy 700 Volt, przy mocy około 3 kW. To zaś oznacza, że jest ona w stanie zabić nieostrożnego dotykalskiego. Wszystkie przewody i podzespoły na jakich panowało będzie owo napięcie powinny więc być starannie zaizolowywane od zewnątrz i zabezpieczone przed przypadkowym dotknięciem. Ponadto bezpieczniki przeciążeniowe powinny zabezpieczać przed zwarciem. Problem jest też z tubą w jakiej panuje próżnia i wypełniona jest trującą rtęcią. W dotychczasowej konstrukcji łatwo spowodować jej pęknięcie i rozprysk rtęci. Wszakże w szwajcarskiej Thesta-Distatica tuba ta umieszczona jest na górze maszyny, co czyni ją szczególnie podatną na przypadkowe uderzenie. Aczkolwiek jest to spektakularne umieszczenie i zapewne w wersjach tej maszyny przeznaczonych na rynek migotliwe jarzenie się tej tuby będzie dodawało maszynie atrakcyjności, jednak w wersji przeznaczonej do eksperymentowania sugerowałbym aby tubę schować w środku płyty podstawowej i dobrze osłonić przed przypadkowym stłuczeniem. Oczywiste powinny być też takie "dodatki bezpieczeństwa", jak uchwyty do łatwego przenoszenia maszyny, pokrywy osłaniające, zamek/stacyjka zabezpieczające przed przypadkowym uruchomieniem przez dzieci, itp.
5G. Dodatkowe nieruchome płyty uchwytowe i półki z pleksiglasu wprowadzone z obu stron tarcz. Umożliwiają one późniejsze montowanie głowic indukujących, grzebieni zbierających, przewodów doprowadzających, itp.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. #F1abc: Wygląd dwutarczowej
telekinetycznej influenzmaschine,
podobnej do "Thesta-Distatica" z
Methernitha, pokazanej w trzech
odmiennych wydokach. Mianowicie
maszyna ta pokazana tutaj jest (a)
w widoku z przodu, (b) w widoku z boku,
oraz (c) w widoku z tyłu. Tzw. "model Dra
Pajaka" był projektowany w taki sposób
aby po ukończeniu wszystkich faz budowy
telekinetycznej influenzmaschine uzyskana
została maszyna bardzo podobna do
tej pokazanej powyżej.
(Click on any above drawing to see it enlarged, or to shift it to another area of the screen.)
Fig. #F1a (left):
Wygląd telekinetycznej influenzmaschine
oglądanej od przodu. Na rysunku zaznaczono
symbolami poszczególne podzespoły istotne
dla jej zadziałania.
Fig. #F1b (middle):
Wygląd telekinetycznej influenzmaschine
oglądanej z jej lewego boku. Na tym rysunku
też zaznaczono symbolami poszczególne
podzespoły istotne dla jej zadziałania.
Fig. #F1c (right):
Wygląd telekinetycznej influenzmaschine
oglądanej od tyłu. Na tym rysunku
też zaznaczono symbolami poszczególne
podzespoły istotne dla jej zadziałania.
* * *
Fig. #F2: Carrying structure (frame) of the telekinetic influenzmaschine.
To this frame components of telekinetic influenzmaschine are later assembled.
(Click on the above drawing to see it enlarged, or to shift it to another area of the screen.)
Part #G:
Construction of the "telekinetic cell" - means
the completion of the second basic component
of the telekinetic influenzmaschine:
#G1.
How to build the "telekinetic battery":
"Bateria telekinetyczna" jest owym podzespołem
telekinetycznej influenzmaschine, który generuje
elektryczność z wydajnością ponad 100%.
Kiedyś na świecie były już produkowane
fabrycznie prymitywne wersje tego ogniwa.
Nazywano je "radiami kryształkowymi" - po
szczegóły patrz opisy ze strony
fe_cell.htm - o podejściu do budowy ogniwa telekinetycznego.
Jak zbudować "baterię telekinetyczą" opisane
zostało relatywnie dobrze w podrozdziale K2.4.2
z tomu 10 monografii
[1/4],
a także na odrębnej stronie internetowej
fe_cell.htm - o podejściu do budowy ogniwa telekinetycznego.
Jedyne więc co czytelnik musi uczynić aby
zrealizować również i niniejszy drugi etap
budowy telekienetycznej influenzmaschine
(czyli aby zbudować "baterię telekinetyczną")
to zbudować sobie i wytestować owo urządzenie.
Kiedy "baterię telekinetyczną" zintegruje się z
opisanym poprzednio "silnikim elektrostatycznym"
faktycznie otrzyma się już zgrubnie działającą
telekinetyczną infuenzmaschine. Tyle że jej
praca będzie raczej eratyczna i wysoce zależna
od warunków zewnętrznych. Aby jej pracę uczynić
niezawodną i powtarzalną, konieczne jest dodanie
"sterownika obrotów tarcz" opisanego w następnej
części.
Part #H:
Construction of the "analogous controller for
rotational speed of discs" - means the completion
of the third and last basic component of the
telekinetic influenzmaschine:
#H1.
How to build the "analogous controller for rotational speed of discs":
The only function of the "analogous controller
for rotational speed of discs" is to maintain
a constant rotational velocity of disk (or disks)
of the entire this machine always on the same
value of 60 rotations per minute (or 1 rotation
per second).
How to build the "analogous controller for rotational
speed of discs" is described relatively well in
subsection K2.3.3 from volume 10 of monograph
[1/4],
and also is roughly summarised on the separate
web page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy.
So only thing that the reader needs to do in order
to implement also this third and last step in
building a telekinetic influenzmaschine (means
to build a "analogous controller for rotational speed
of discs") is to construct and test this component,
and then integrate it with the remaining components
of the telekinetic influenzmaschine.
Fig. #H1: Kinematical diagram of telekinetic influenzmaschine.
Illustrated are components that carry out rotational motion , i.e.
two disks - frontal (dc) and back (dg), two belt rollers for both
discs - frontal (Pc) and back (Pg), belt (B), and spindle (Ts) for
the "analogous controller for rotational speed of discs" with its
two belt rollers - the rotational (Pb) and fixed (Pr). Notice that
the axis of rotation of the spindle (Ts) is located in the plane that
is perpendicular to the axis of rotation of both glass disks (dc) and (dg).
This spindle (Ts) is practically the spinning part of the "dynamo-motor"
which controls the work of this machine.
(Click on the above drawing to see it enlarged, or to shift it to another area of the screen.)
Part #I:
Facts which unambiguously prove that devices
of telekinetics can be build after all - means the
philosophical foundations for devices of telekinetics:
#I1.
Present "scientific laws" that supposedly rule energy,
are like warnings of medieval Inquisition about the
trip to the edge of world:
Motto:
"By formulation of 'laws' which supposedly rule energy,
but without earlier working out the 'definition' of energy,
present human science pushes itself into a kind of
"vicious-cycle" which closes for the humanity an access
to unlimited sources of energy that are offered to us by
attributes of natural programs called 'energy'."
Although it can shock us enormously, so-called
"laws" which according to present science supposedly
rule energy, are equally absurd like warnings
of monks from early medieval times about the
travelling to the edge of world and falling down
from a cliff there directly to the "hell". After all,
these laws were formulated before the science
was able to earn the knowledge as to what
actually this "energy" is. On the other hand,
without knowing what energy actually is, the
science had no either logical basis, nor
required data, to discover the true laws that
rule over energy. In turn erroneous assumption
of scientists that the "laws", which the science
formulated much earlier, still are supposedly
correct, make it impossible for the science to
determine what really "energy" is, and what
laws really rule over this energy. In the result,
in matters of energy the official human science
pushed itself into the situation of a "dog that
tries to bite its own tail", means in a kind of
"vicious-cycle" which has no end. In this item
I am going to justify the above finding.
A problem with medieval monks that provided
e.g. staff for Inquisition, boiled down to issuing
judgements and warning exclusively on the basis
of their own imagination, instead on the basis of
confirmed facts. For example, these monks had
no even a slightest idea about the shape of Earth.
However, they still issued definitive and authoritative
judgements about trips to the edge of world. While not knowing
the definition of the Earth which would, amongst
others, inform about the true shape of our planet,
these monks imagined that the world is flat like
a pancake, while at edges it finishes with a cliff
that leads straight to a "hell". So according to their
claims, everyone who in medieval times would
attempt to sail e.g. to present New Zealand or
Australia, at some stage of the trip would fall down
from the edge of Earth and would land in the "hell".
So in order to save such impudent travellers from the
"hell", monks just in case burned them on stake
immediately after they expressed the wish to go
sailing for such a distant trip. However, the most
shocking is that this strange medieval behaviour
is copied exactly by present "modern" scientists
in all matters relating to energy.
Let us consider how and why the claims of present
human science about energy, copy exactly the
behaviour of these medieval monks. Well, in
spite that scientists still have NOT earned
a definition that would explain what actually this
"energy" is and how energy works, the science
insisted long ago on the formulation of "laws",
such as the "principle of energy conservation",
or so-called "laws of thermodynamics".
Thus, the only thing on which these "laws"
were based, were believes and views -
very similar to these ones which people from
the early medieval times had about the shape
of Earth. After all, without knowing the definition
of energy that would explain exactly what this
"energy" really is, the official science does NOT
have any rational basis for the formulation of
"laws" which would describe behaviours of that
energy. This is because claiming how the energy
behaves, when actually we do NOT know
what this energy is, actually copies such medieval
opinions of monks about what happens when
someone goes into a trip to edges of world -
announced in the situation when in fact no-one
had a slightest idea what shape this world really takes.
In order to illustrate here how absurd are opinions
of present science about attributes and behaviours
of energy, let us consider an example of the definition
of energy which the official science provides today.
Although depending on the textbook which one uses,
these definitions may utilise slightly different wordings,
basically all of them are going to state something
along the lines that "energy is an ability to complete
work". In other words, present scientific definition
of energy is a copy of medieval definition of the
planet Earth, which stated something along lines
that "the Earth is a place where godly creatures
can live". Means none of these definitions teaches
us about the attributes and work of whatever it
describes. For example, in case of energy, the
present official scientific definition still does
NOT explain characteristics
of energy nor allows to deduce how energy works.
In turn, in case of the planet Earth, the medieval
definition does NOT explain anything about the
shape of Earth nor allows to deduce how one
can travel safely across the Earth. Furthermore,
none of these definitions allows to deduce anything
about "laws" that rule over whatever is defined.
Of course, scientists can also attempt to define
energy on the basis of "laws" which supposedly
rule over the behaviour of it. For example, from the
content of the "conservation of energy principle"
it would appear that "energy" is a kind of "indestructible
substance or liquid", and thus it fulfils the "law of
balance" called the "principle of energy conservation".
But the formulation of definition on the basis of
"laws" which were formulated without having these
definition, is logically wrong. It resembles the attempt
to "lift ourselves by pulling our own hair". In other words,
both the understanding of energy as an "indestructible
liquid", and also the "principle of energy conservation"
announced to supposedly be obeyed by this
"indestructible liquid", are just a big nonsense.
For me personally it is difficult to understand why
rationally thinking scientists treat both these as
sure truths. After all, these both represent just
speculations and empty words which are based
just on themselves - means on the same speculations
and empty words, while they are NOT based on
the reality that surrounds us.
The nonsense of scientific "laws" related to energy,
and formulated in the situation when the science
does NOT know the correct definition which would
explain what this "energy" actually is, is well illustrated
by the definition of energy formulated by the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
(Notice that so-far the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
is NOT recognised by the official human science.)
This definition states that "energy is a kind of
most elementary natural program that resides in
the counter-matter and that describes the behaviour
of matter in every situation to which this matter can
be subjected". The more comprehensive
description of this definition is contained in publications
which explain the Concept of Dipolar Gravity - for
example in item #E2 from the totaliztic web page
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or from subsections H4.1 (see "C1" in there) and
H9.2 in volume 4 of monograph
[1/5].
The difference between the definitions to-date
disseminated by the official science, and the
above definition of energy formulated by the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity (which is still ignored
by the official human science), is enormous.
After all, the Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains
to us exactly what actually this energy is. In this
way the Concept of Dipolar Gravity provides us
with scientific foundations for rational deducing
attributes and behaviours of energy. As it turns
out, energy actually is a "natural program" and
thus it displays all attributes of a "program" - not
attributes of an "indestructible substance or liquid"
that so-far were given to it by "laws of science".
Of course, differences between behaviours of a
"natural program", and behaviours of an
"indestructible substance or liquid", are huge.
For example, into a program can be imprinted
an algorithm of such a behaviour that the "principle
of energy conservation" is fulfilled in the majority
of cases. But due to the complexity of this program,
which must correspond to already learned algorithms
of complex behaviours of energy, it will inevitably have
both, some intentionally introduced sections, as well
as algorithmic paradoxes, which are going to allow
that this "principle of energy conservation" in special
circumstances is going to be replaced by a completely
different principle - sometimes even by an exactly opposite one.
In turn this hypothetic "indestructible substance or
liquid" that results from "laws of science" to-date,
always must fulfil the "principle of energy conservation".
In other words, because of defining "laws" that rule over
energy, before the "energy" itself was defined, the official
human science put itself into a kind of misleading
"vicious-cycle". This vicious-cycle closes
the science from the capability to notice and to seek
non-typical capabilities which true attributes and
true behaviours of energy offer to people.
Trapped inside of the "vicious-cycle" which it
created for itself, the present official human science
refuses to consider a whole range of capabilities
of energy generation which are created by the
true attributes and true behaviours of energy.
Examples of such capabilities include the
construction of devices that have over 100%
energy efficiency, and also the construction of
devices presently called the "generators of free
energy", while in past simply named "perpetual
motion". In spite that working prototypes of these
devices were already constructed and tested on
the Earth, and in spite that these prototypes actually
do work - as this is described on the totaliztic web
page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy,
the official human science trapped inside of a
"vicious-cycle" that it created for itself, stubbornly
refuses to recognise the existence of these devices
and these capabilities. What is even more interesting,
the present science takes such a definite stand
in spite that everything it states about "energy" in
fact is "sucked from a finer" (or taken from a ceiling)
and does NOT finds confirmation in the existing reality.
It is shocking that these claims of "modern" scientists
regarding energy copy so closely statements of
medieval monks about the shape of Earth. This is
even more painful, because similarly as medieval
monks utilised tortures to impose their views on the
rest of society, also present official human science
utilises modern versions of medieval tortures in
order to also impose their wrong views onto the
entire human civilisation. Only that instead of
"burning on stake", present science uses e.g. blocking
from access to employment and from source of income,
public accusations, calling names, scoffing, throwing
mud, etc., etc. (For examples of "tools of torture"
used by modern science and scientists - see fates
of inventions discussed on the web page
mozajski_uk.htm - about fate of inventors of first airplanes,
or see examples of reactions of scientists to major
inventions and discoveries summarised in subsection
JB7.3 from volume 7 of monograph
[1/4].)
* * *
Let us summarise here the major point that
the above findings try to make. Namely, the
appropriate use of "natural programs", which
presently we call "energy", promises an easy
access of humanity to unlimited resources of
free energy. The exploitation of this free energy
would NOT cause any damage to the natural
environment. All that people need to do to harvest
these unlimited energy resources is to initiate
a mass industrial production of so-called
"free energy devices" which have over 100%
energy efficiency, and which work similarly as
the so-called "perpetual motion" devices described
in past. There are already working prototypes
of such "free energy devices" - described on
the totaliztic web page
free_energy.htm - about telekinetic generators of free energy.
Furthermore, findings of the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
prove that these "free energy devices" truly can
be build. Unfortunately, the humanity has a
"philosophical problem" with undertaking
the building and industrial production of devices
which accomplish over 100% energy efficiency,
and thus which in past used to be called "perpetual
motion". (For more details regarding present
philosophies of people see the totaliztic web pages named
totalizm.htm and
parasitism.htm.)
Namely, as this is explained above, the official human science
placed itself into the situation of as a "dog which tries
to bite its own tail". This is because it postulated
"laws" which supposedly rule over energy, while
the science still does NOT know what this energy really is.
Furthermore, presently the science uses these baseless
(supposed) "laws" to define attributes of energy and
behaviours of energy. In this way the science closes
the circulation of empty speculations putting itself
into a "vicious-cycle" which disallows it to learn
what energy truly is. This "vicious-cycle" stops
the science from attempts to develop correct "laws"
that would described the true behaviour of energy.
In addition to the above, present science is atheistic.
This in turn places in front of its adepts an additional
"philosophical obstacle" which in the real universe
does NOT exist nor work. Namely, the atheism makes impossible
for scientists to understand, that the universe created by
God,
was intentionally designed so intelligently, that
"everything that can be invented can also
be completed" - as more comprehensively
it is explained in the next item #I2 of this web page.
#I2.
According to the philosophy of
totalizm
"everything that can be invented can also be completed" -
including also devices of telekinetics:
Motto:
"Certain things would be impossible only in the
'atheistic universe' which evolved randomly. But
in the universe created and ruled intelligently by
God,
'every pure goal is physically accomplishable
if it can be mentally defined and if it is NOT
imposing the requirement that the universe
must operate in a specific way that is contradictive
to the way God make it operate'."
The major problem that present people have
with actual building machines of telekinetics which are able to
accomplish over 100% energy efficiency, is of a
philosophical type.
Namely, as this is explained in item #D1 of a
separate web page
god_proof.htm - about scientific proofs that God really does exist,
the atheistic scientists believe (and together with them
the rest of present society also believes so), that in an
accidentally formed universe the majority of goals
and intentions is impossible to accomplish or implement.
So they even do NOT try to accomplish some goals
that they decided to consider impossible. However,
it turns out (as this is explained by the philosophy of
totalizm
on the web page devoted to it), that the real
universe created by God was on purpose designed
so intelligently, that "everything that is possible to mentally
invent, is also possible to accomplish". Thus the
construction of machines of telekinetics of over
100% energy efficiency is also possible - we just
need to contribute to this building the effort of
finding a way how these machines can be accomplished.
The philosophy of totalizm is described on the
separate web page
totalizm.htm - about the most moral, progressive, peaceful, and fulfilling philosophy of the world.
It was this philosophy that derived logically such
extremely vital postulate, which states:
"every goal that is possible to envisage is also
possible to accomplish". The description of
logical deduction that leads to deriving this
postulate is contained in subsection I5.4 from
volume 5 of the newest
monograph [1/5],
and also in item #B4 of the web page named
telepathy.htm - about telepathy and devices which utilise telepathic waves.
(Notice that monograph [1/5] is disseminated
free of charge via this web page.)
Expressing the above in other words, since
devices of telekinetics can be invented, defined,
and described, and since they are a pure goal
which does NOT impose the manner how the
universe supposed to operate, according to
findings of the philosophy of totalizm these
devices can also be completed.
Part #J:
Unofficial history of research and development
of telekinetic machines:
The history of development of new inventions
on the Earth illustrates an intriguing although
always repeated pattern. Namely, when the
humanity reaches the level of the development
in which it becomes ripe for building a new type
of devices, then these new devices appear on
our planet in several copies simultaneously.
Means, they are invented simultaneously and
independently by a number of creative individuals
who do not co-operate with each other, and thus
who do not know details of the developments of
others. (It is worth to notice, that just such a
simultaneous appearing on the Earth several
new inventions of the same device certifies that
the development of technical creativity on the
Earth is "remotely controlled". Therefore it is
highly desirable that people start to investigate
whether this "remote control" over the inventiveness
is inspired by God described on the web page
god.htm - about the scientific and secular understanding of God,
or by inhabitants of some more than humanity
advanced and friendly towards people extraterrestrial
"totaliztic" civilisation described in caption under
"Fig. #2" and in item #D6 from web page
telepathy.htm - about telepathy and about devices that utilise telepathic waves.)
A perfect example of such an invention that was
developed simultaneously by several creative
people is an airplane the appearance of which
on the Earth is described on the web page
mozajski.htm - about the inventor of the first airplane on the Earth.
Such a multiple and completely independent
inventing also seems to be the case with the
telekinetic influenzmaschine. Until that moment
I am aware of the existence of three inventors
of the telekinetic influenzmaschine, each one
of whom either build this device independently
of the others, or just independently worked out
the operation and the design of it. These inventors
are (chronologically): Adalbert Béla Brosan of
Linz (Austria), Paul Baumann of Linden (Switzerland),
and me - the author of this web page (New Zealand).
Just at that period of time we all participate in the
formation of the history of these immensely vital
for our civilisation devices of telekinetics. Simultaneously,
unfortunately, the official human science displays
a very bad and philosophically totally unjustified
attitude towards these particular devices.
Therefore almost no-one neither writes the
history of these devices, nor officially researches
this history. On the other hand, it is quite important
that this history is somehow recorded for the use
of next generations of humans, and that the moral
conclusions that are drawn from it could finally
serve to humanity. Therefore I decided to write
down these sections of the history which are
known to me. But because I do NOT have funds
for the scientific verification of the correctness of
whatever come to my knowledge, the history which
I am presenting here is based on scientifically
unverified information acquired during private
discussions, and sometimes even heard on
principles of curiosities, rumours, or gossips.
However, such a character of the history described
here still reveals to us the general course of fate
of these extraordinary machines of telekinetics.
In turn the knowledge of these general fate of
the machines allows us to draw conclusions listed
in part #K of this web page. In turn every history
is just about this, means about the ability to draw
constructive conclusions which are applicable
to our current situation.
#J1.
The first in the world devices of telekinetics invented by Adalbert Béla Brosan of Linz, Austria:
About the first inventor of the telekinetic influenzmaschines
almost no-one knows. Also his name cannot be find anywhere.
I learned about him by "pure coincidence" only in 1991.
(According to the philosophy of moral
totalizm
described in chapters JA and JB from monograph
[1/4],
there is no such thing as "pure coincidence", and all events
that affect us are purposely designed by the "universal intellect"
(God), so that always is a clear goal for them to happen.)
In 1991, means in the period of the most intense research
on my theory of the Telekinetic Effect and on telekinetic
generators of free energy, I met an Austrian couple
.
They emigrated to New Zealand in search of an alternative
(natural) lifestyle. The information and facts this couple provided
could not be verified because of technical reasons. Therefore
I only repeat it here in the form as it was reported to me.
The couple, at some stage in their life, observed the fate of the
invention of their acquaintance named Adalbert Béla Brosan
(address in 1965: Schiffmeisterplatz 5, Ybbs/Donau near Linz,
Austria). He got into the possession of the design for a wonder
device of the "perpetual motion" type, which represented an
improved model of the Töpler's electrostatic machine. When
put by hands into the motion, his device kept rotating infinitively,
while simultaneously it produced electricity. Brosan described
his invention in the brochure [1K2.3.1] "Weltfrieden durch
Kostenlose Energie", published in 1965 by Karl Schenenberger
Verlag (address in 1965: Stapfenstrasse 187, Helden, Switzerland).
The Austrian couple had in New Zealand a copy of this brochure
and familiarised me with the content of it. Unfortunately, Adalbert
Béla Brosan did not provide any diagram nor technological details
of his machine in his brochure. Because Brosan was a theoretician,
he had no technical skills nor tools or equipment required to build
his device himself. Therefore, to complete a prototype of his invention,
he formed a partnership with the local "golden-hand" named Nitschel
that originated from the area of Linz. (It seems to be the vital detail,
that Nitschel was known not only for his ability to make everything,
but also from his radical religious convictions, for which he came
to the notice of the local authorities.) With the assistance of Nitschel's
technical skills, Brosan built two small prototypes of his device.
Brosan managed to show the operation of his prototypes to a few
friends and acquaintances, including the couple who reported the
whole story to me. According to descriptions, both these prototypes
were of an appearance and size identical to models of the "Testatica"
currently owned by the Methernitha. Unfortunately, soon afterwards
Brosan died. In turn Nitschel, together with both operational devices
supposedly shifted to Switzerland to the Apenzell area (CH-9050),
tel: (071) 914110. The further fate of Nitschel, as well as the Brosan's
devices, has been impossible to establish for me. But it should be
noticed, that two small devices called the "Testatica", which according
to existing descriptions look identically to these constructed by Brosan,
are currently in the possession of the Swiss religious community calling
itself "Methernitha". This is the end of the story (as I heard it) about the
first inventor and builder of the telekinetic influenzmaschine.
#J2.
Devices of Paul Baumann from the Swiss religious
commune called Methernitha (means two "Testatica"
machines, and also the world famous
Thesta-Distatica):
According to the information which come to my
attention, the person which is commonly believed
to be the inventor of telekinetic devices which work
on principles of telekinetic influenzmaschines, in
reality is only the second inventor of these machines.
This person is the late Paul Baumann (1917 to 2001)
from the Swiss religious commune called Methernitha.
In the Internet, and also in almost all publications,
he is the one indicated as the first builder of these
machines. On the other hand, Paul Bauman himself
NEVER claimed that it was him who build these
machines. What even more, rumours which I have
heard on this subject claimed that simply when one
day for some reason he landed in a prison, he returned
to Methernitha from this prison with two devices of
telekinetics already working, namely with two small
"Testatica" machines. Furthermore, the appearance
of these two "Testatica" was identical to the appearance
of two machines build by Bela Brosana. Thus the
question for which it would be worth to find an answer
one day, is whether in this prison he met the helper
of Bela Brosan, means this "golden hand" named Nitschel.
Paul Baumann was born in 1917 in a multi-children
farming family near Linden, Switzerland. Even as a
pupil of local primary school he demonstrated unusual
technical talents, building various experimental devices.
At an older age he become known for his clock-making
capabilities. Around 1950, together with twelve of his
farming friends, he organized in Linden the religious
community Methernitha. (Address in 1991: Methernitha,
CH 3517 Linden bei Bern, Switzerland.) The principles
of this community recreate and implement the life of first
Christian communes. When in 1991 I visited Methernitha,
Baumann was one of the leaders of this commune.
Everything seems to indicate that due to his religious
involvements he get in touch with Nitschel (Brosan's
helper), who also adhered to radical religious believes.
In the Internet I encountered an information that Paul
Baumann died in winter 2001. After his death telekinetic
machines which previously were under his control become
properties of individual members of his developmental
team. But in spite that some amongst these members still
carry out research and development on these machines,
and in spite that they have working prototypes, as so-far
no-one was able to build another (fourth) working prototype
of such a machine. Most clearly the construction of this
fourth prototype must wait until I manage to find appropriate
conditions for their research and development.
The interest of Paul Baumann in telekinetic influenzmaschines
began already around 1965, means in times when
Bela Brosan constructed his machines. But the first
two operational prototypes of these machines come
to his ownership only around the year 1978. He called
these first machines Testatica. However, the
manner and the place in which these machines were
constructed are wrapped in the mist of secrecy and
mystery. Also I never heard that Paul Baumann himself
ever claimed that he invented Testatica or that he build
them by himself - although other people assigned the
invention and construction of these machines to him.
"Testatica" were built as small, single-disk, telekinetic
free energy devices, whose principles of operation were
based on the Töpler's electrostatic machine (i.e. these
free energy devices had only a single disk, whereas the
function of a second disk was performed by stationary
electrodes). Two copies of "Testatica" were built. They
are operational until today, kept in the confines of the
Methernitha community. They produce around 200 Watt
of electric energy each.
Around 1983, this time supported by seven men
from his new developmental team at Methernitha,
Paul Baumann built the third model of his free energy
device. It remains unknown for sure whether a member
of this developmental team was the helper of Brosan,
means this mysterious Nitschel. However, gossips
that I heard seem to suggest it. The machine constructed
this time had two counter-rotating disks. He called it the
Thesta-Distatica - see the appearance of it
shown below in "Fig. #D1". The explanation for this
name given to me was that "Thesta" means "prototype
for testing", "Di" means "having two disks", whereas "statica"
means "based on electrostatic interactions". The operation
of this new free energy device seems to copy the two-disk
Wimshurst electrostatic machine, although in reality it
is very far from that machine. In Methernitha it was claimed
that the use of two disks allowed for a better induction
of electrostatic charges, thus increasing the output from
this free energy device. However, this claim is NOT
true nor is supported by the principle of operation of
this machine (described in subsection K2.3.3 in monograph
[1/4]). After all, according to this principle of operation,
this output depends on the efficiency of the "telekinetic
battery" that is embedded into this machine, not on the
number of diameter of discs. I personally believe that
Paul Baumann intentionally introduced these two discs
for psychological reasons. Namely he wanted to visually
emphasize the difference of the machine that he build,
from both "Testatica" machines which he just got somehow
already constructed by someone else. However, because
he has NOT knew what is the principle of operation of this
machine, in his design he so solved the operation of the
back disk, that it is an exact copy of the operation of the front
disk. In turn both these disks faithfully copy the operation
of a single disk from the "Testatica" machine. Means, in
spite that "Thesta-Distatica" uses two disks, in reality its
operation models the work of two "Testatica" machines,
only that integrated with each other into a single machine.
Some kind of curiosity can raise the fact that
Thesta-Distatica displays a few details which are
at least an unusual "coincidence". For example,
the nominal diameters of both disks of the Thesta-Distatica
are 0.548 meter, i.e. are exactly equal to the unit
of length which in monograph [1/4] is called the
"cosmic cubit" and used by
UFOnauts who secretly occupy the Earth
for the dimensioning of their Magnocraft-like UFO
spaceships - see the web page
explain.htm.
In turn one amongst components of this machine
is the "tube" (see "T" in "Fig. #D2" and "Fig. #D3" from
free_energy.htm)
which is identical to the one that also appears in
the "telepathic pyramid" given to the humanity
by a totaliztic cosmic civilisation that is friendly
towards people. This "tube" gifted to us is shown
in "Fig. #2" from the web page
telepathy.htm.
All signs on heaven and earth indicate that after
building "Thesta-Distatica" for some reasons
Nitschel left Methernitha. Probably it was him
who in the nearby town Thun established the
one-man competitive group called Vene
the name of which was an abbreviation from words
Vereinigung Erforschung Natürlicher Energie
(address in 1991: Vene, Postfach 334, Ch-3606,
Thun, Switzerland). Later there was a visible
rivarly between Vene and Methernitha.
The "Vene" group tried to start a serial production
of two-disk telekinetic influenzmaschines similar
to Thesta-Distatica, and to make money on selling
these machines. However, for some reasons,
which scientifically probably could be explained
e.g. by the lack of capital and the poor developmental
capabilities which were much lower than these
of Methernitha (or these provided earlier to Nitschel
by Bela Brosan), caused that the Vene group had
NOT managed to produce completely even a
single such working machine. (It is known that
the Vene group attempted the construction of
several different prototypes of such machines -
see "Fig. #E2" from further part of this web page.)
In 1991 Paul Baumann together with this time
a new developmental team began the completion
of his next, third model, while fourth device of
such telekinetic influenzmaschines. The construction
and most of technical details of this new machine
remain unknown to me at the present stage. However
I have heard various rumours spread around which
said that it was a giant machine. For example,
its two disks has supposedly had the diameter of
around 2.2 meters (i.e. 4 "cosmic cubits"). Unfortunately,
as I have heard, the building of this huge device of
telekinetics never was finished with a success. So
in spite that Methernitha had in its ownership two
working devices of telekinetics, means two small
"Testatica" and one bigger "Thesta-Distatica", and
also in spite that the developmental team was directed
by Paul Baumann himself, who is considered to be
the inventor of these devices, the Methernitha
developmental team was unable to make this
fourth device to work. (I.e. it managed to build it,
but was unable to fine tune it sufficiently to make
it work.) So this fact seems to suggest that in
times of building this fourth device of telekinetics
in the Methernitha team clearly was missing the
knowledge and experience of this mysterious
Nitschel (i.e. Bela Brosan helper).
#J3.
My own theoretical research and development
on the telekinetic generators of free energy -
means the research and development carried out by
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak:
As I mentioned it before, I am the third inventor
of the telekinetic influenzmaschine. My invention
was initially born not from the attempt to build
it myself, but from a need to describe this free
energy device in the first edition of monograph
monograph [6].
Only after I developed theoretically all technical
details of this machine and after I became sure
that I know exactly how to build it, I decided to
prepare an attempt to start a serial factory
production of it - as I am describing it in item
#F1 below. Unfortunately, the fate interrupted
this my preparations just before I begun
the building of the first production prototype.
So here is the history of my invention of this
machine.
In 1989 I developed the first edition of my monograph
[6] about generators of free energy. When writing this
monograph I considered it to be my duty to also describe
in it the famous Testa-Distatica. Unfortunately, I had
no access to any description of this device apart from
the earlier mentioned very brief item [2K2.3.1] from
the Raum & Zeit, (nr 34, Juni/Juli 1988, page 94).
However, knowing the action of the "Telekinetic Effect",
the general design of free energy devices, and the
operation of Wimshurst electrostatic machine, I managed
to work out and to describe in my monograph [6] how
the telekinetic influenzmaschine should look and operate.
The subsequent visit to the Methernitha almost three
years later (i.e. in 1991), reassured me that all the
key technical features of my invention, which I envisaged
and designed, were almost identical to those already
implemented in the existing model of the Thesta-Distatica.
This repeated invention of the telekinetic influenzmaschine
by myself still again confirms the regularity, that when the
right time arrives for a specific invention to be made, then
many people is inspired by some mysterious force to
formulate this invention completely independently from
each other. This in turn can be interpreted as a confirmation,
that inventions represent a kind of gift that is addressed
to the entire humanity, not just to people who developed
them first. At present times, when because of the
dark forces which secretly occupy the Earth
the dissemination of information about telekinetic machines
of Methernitha is successfully blocked, I understand that it
is my duty and responsibility to disseminate the idea, principle
of operation, and the design of these telekinetic machines,
thus saving them from becoming forgotten and inspiring
other people for undertaking their development.
After I invented and described in
monograph [6]
the design and operation of the telekinetic
influenzmaschine, I also started preparations
for building a prototype of it and for subjecting
this prototype to a serial factory production.
Unfortunately, when everything was ready
for the initiation of the development of this
prototype, unexpectedly I lost my job of a
scientist. So my plans were forced to be
abandoned - as I described this in item
#F1 from the further part of this web page.
Fortunately, these old preparations to
building the prototype were NOT lost.
This is because presently I have ready
plans as to how initiate the building of
this machine. So I can now publish these
plans here, on this web page.
I should add here, that I do NOT belong to a
group of individuals who were "defeated" in
attempts to build the telekinetic influenzmaschine -
as this is described in item #E2 of this web page.
After all, I never got the chance to even start this
building. I always was by someone intentionally
stopped against the initiation of such building.
The dark powers which continually and
persistently hold me back from the
undertaking the building of numerous devices
of my invention, in item #11 of the web page
fe_cell.htm
are called impersonally the "curse of inventors".
But in reality it is not just an impersonal curse,
but specific people and well-known institutions
which I am able to name and to pinpoint. In case
of New Zealand and Australia their activities are
much stronger than in any other highly developed
country in the world. It is because of the continuous
action of these forces that hide behind the "curse
of inventors" that neither New Zealand nor Australia
managed to contribute so-far any breakthrough to
the technical development of our civilisation, that
would be developed completely on the soil of these
countries. And all this in spite that in both countries
surprisingly many new ideas are born. Either creators
of these new ideas are forced by these dark powers
to leave their country and to develop their ideas overseas -
as this happened with the New Zealand genius named
Ernst Rutherford. Or these creators try to accomplish
something in their own countries, but because of this
"curse of inventors" they are defeated from hands
of their own countrymen - as this happened with
Richard Pearse described on the web page
mozajski_uk.htm - about the creator of the first airplane on the Earth,
and with Peter Daysh Davey described on the web page
boiler.htm - about the creator of an extraordinary heater.
This strong operation in Australia and in New Zealand
of this power behind the "curse of inventors" is also
one amongst factors which caused that on the web page
tfz.htm - about the need for establishing the "telekinesis free zone" on the Earth
I propose that such a "telekinesis free zone" is established
in these two countries. (This zone would be an area on the
Earth where, to NOT repeat the mistake that the humanity
make in past with antibiotics and with pesticides, the use
of all telekinetic devices would be forbidden. This would
also include the ban on the use of "machines of telekinetics"
described on this web page.)
The main difference between myself and other
developers and researchers of devices of telekinetics,
depends on this that I already learned principles
of operation of these devices. I also know well
main phenomena that are vital for the operation
of these devices. Furthermore, my professional
experience as a scientist and a university lecturer
allows me to describe exactly this design and
operation of these devices. In this way I am capable
to inspire other people to undertake the building
of these wonder machines. Finally the philosophy of
totalizm
to which I adhere allow me to do all this on completely
altruistic principles, means allow me to honestly and
thoroughly describe the design and operation of
machines of telekinetics just for the good of humanity,
without making secret anything and without expecting
to draw any material benefits from this description.
Part #K:
Let us draw useful conclusions from the lessons of the history which
God
was kind enough to give to us through the shaping of fate
of telekinetic influenzmaschines in the way this is described above:
#K1.
What lessons stem from the to-date fate of the telekinetic influenzmaschines:
Our religion presents to us
God
as a kind of 2000-years old, humanly looking oldie,
who is mainly preoccupied with forgiving us our
sins and has no much time to direct correctly the
fate of the entire universe. Therefore, according
to religions, the supervision of the majority of
matters of this physical world this God-oldie
delegated to the Earthly religious institutions.
However, the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
discloses to us a completely different picture of
God. According to this "theory of everything"
God
is fact is a kind of a huge unforgiving natural
program, with the "iron hand" controls
practically everything that happens in the
entire universe. His control extends starting
from behaviours of elementary particles in
atoms, through the creation, giving life, and
control over the fate of every living organism,
and finishing on the creation and destruction
of huge galaxies. A relatively good picture as
to how this God from the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity actually looks like and operates, provide
descriptions that start in item #J1 from the web page
evolution.htm - about the truth regarding evolution.
Of course, according to the "theory of everything",
this true and omnipotent God not only that controls
the fate of everything, but additionally makes this
in such a manner that amongst many possible
courses that fates of everything can take, always
implemented was the course which to us people
provides the most educational lessons for analysis.
In turn such a maximum "educational" course
of everything means, that also the fate to-date
of the "telekinetic influenzmaschine" were intentionally
directed by this God in a manner in which we currently
see this fate. So our task is now to learn the moral
lesson which via the fate of this machine the omnipotent
and omni-knowledgeable God decided to serve to us.
God was able to direct the fate of telekinetic
influenzmaschines on many different ways.
But in His infinite wisdom God shaped the fate
of these machines into a very intriguing pattern
which I described in part #J above. Of course,
by just such and not other shaping this fate, God
definitively intended to pass to us some important
moral lesson. In order to learn what this lesson
is, let us analyse now the main components of
this fate.
1. Consequences of maintaining the secrecy about
technical details of these machines. In fact each
single one amongst original builders of telekinetic
influenzmaschines maintained secrecy about the
vital technical details of machines that he constructed.
Therefore neither Bela Brosan, nor Nitschel, nor
Paul Baumann did NOT leave for humanity detailed
guidelines as to how these machines should be
constructed. Apart for several general statements,
and apart of several photographs, in fact our
civilisation completely does NOT have any
production documentation for these machines.
What even worse, each one amongst these
original builders of telekinetic influenzmaschines
died not later than several years after building his
devices. In turn together with deaths of these
original builders, also the secret of the design
and operation of these extraordinary machines
disappeared completely. The above indicates
that the first moral lesson which
God
tries to give us is that "these creative people who
develop completely new inventions have the
moral duty to inform fully the rest of our civilisation
about every vital detail of their inventions". In
turn in cases when they are going to maintain
in secrecy any vital details of their invention,
then their invention will be taken away from
the humanity.
2. Such directing my own fate that I reinvented again
the telekinetic influenzmaschines and other devices of
telekinetics. In my opinion it is NOT a coincidence
that God so directed the fate of telekinetic influenzmaschines,
that it is me who has the honour and responsibility
to reinvent again and to disseminate the design and
principles of operation of these machines. After all
my views about inventions are characterised by
several canons, which so-far were NOT understood
nor respected on the Earth. The most vital amongst
these canons is that "exact technical descriptions of
every invention on the Earth should be made available
without any limitations to every person who wishes
to learn it". The justification for this canon I provided
in item #G1 of the totaliztic web page
boiler.htm - about the creator and fate of extraordinary telekinetic heater.
Another also relatively important canon is that
"the true goal of life of every person is to accomplish
happiness". Therefore the goal of governments
of individual countries should NOT be present
"guarding the existing status-quo", but should be
"assisting people in the maximisation of their
happiness" - as I explained this more comprehensively
on the web page
partia_totalizmu_uk.htm - about the ideology of everlasting happiness of all people.
In turn to allow people to be independent from
despotic governments and tyrannical politicians
which try to forcefully hold the humanity tided
to old ideologies, it is necessary that every
person on the Earth is able to build by himself
devices of telekinetics which will supply this
person into all energy which this person needs.
(All this in addition to the wide availability of
such devices produced in factories.) Thus
another moral message which God reveals
to us through giving the fate of telekinetic
machines into my hands is that the exact
descriptions of the operation, as well as
guidelines for constructing these devices
of telekinetics, should be accessible without
any obstructions for practically every person
on the Earth.
3. The giving this machine to members of the religious
community Methernitha. In my opinion, it is also
NO coincidence that all original telekinetic influenzmaschines
landed in the religious commune Methernitha. In my
opinion this fact is a kind of symbolic message from
God telling us what these machines should be used for.
Namely, as I explain this on the web page
nirvana.htm - about the replacement of present rewarding work with money by rewarding work with totaliztic nirvana,
the goal of God in the giving to people machines
which are to provide abundance of free energy,
is that these people change drastically the principles
on which societies do operate. Namely, instead
of present societies that are based on centralised
governing, politicians, forcing labour from people,
and money, God commands us to begin the life
modelled on the first Christian communes, in which
work for others would have a voluntary character,
while the rewards for this work would be the accomplishment
of totaliztic nirvana. The machines of telekinetics
discussed here just provide to the humanity technical
means for carrying out such a change. In turn the
model for this change is the religious commune
Methernitha to the use of which God gave these
extraordinary machines.
The above components of moral lesson which
God tries to give us via the machines discussed
here, reveal exactly what we need to do in order
God allowed us to build these machines and to
benefit from goodness which these machines
bring to our civilisation.
#K2.
So how we should carry out the research and
development of telekinetic machines so that
God
allows us to build these much needed devices:
The recipe for adopting such an approach
to the construction and research of telekinetic
influenzmaschine that the development of it
finishes with a success, is very simple. Namely,
it is enough that from the fate to-date of this
machine we draw conclusions as to how
God
wishes we build this machine. Then in our
approach to the research and development
of this machine we simply implement whatever
God demands from us regarding it,
a co implikuje opisanym w poprzednim
punkcie #K1 sposobem na jaki pokierował
On jej dotychczasowymi losami.
The analysis of fate of telekinetic influenzmaschines
carried out in the previous item #K1 of this web
page, indicates that these machines will be allowed
to be constructed on the Earth if (a) none
of their vital technical details is kept secret, but
every information about the design and principles
of operation of these machines is made accessible
to every interested person, (b) descriptions
of manners of building these machines are so precise
and so easy for accessing that everyone who wishes
to build them in order to get free from any form of
oppression will be able to handmade them without
any technical difficulties, and (c) that via
these machines people are reminded that they
have a duty to support and to implement such
social systems which serve the maximisation
of happiness of people and parting of humanity
from rewarding work with money (means to support
ideologies and social systems that are aimed at the
"maximisation of happiness" and described on the
web page
partia_totalizmu_uk.htm - about the ideology of eternal happiness of all people).
Part #L:
The "telekinetics" researches not only "telekinetic cells"
and "free energy devices":
#L1.
The discipline called "telekinetics" is a path to an entire ocean
of scientific and philosophical benefits, which the humanity is
to harvest from the mastery of technology that is based on behaviours of the "counter-matter":
On a separate web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm
is explained, that independently from "our physical
world", on the other end of gravity dipole exists an
entire huge "counter-world" filled-up with the unique,
ever-moving liquid called the "counter-matter".
The "totaliztic science" described in item #C1 of this
web page is to open the technical utilisation of that
"counter-matter" for constructing extraordinary devices
of our future, such as
Oscillatory Chambers of all three generations,
telekinetic vehicles,
or even
time vehicles.
Therefore "telekinetic cells" and "devices for generation
of free energy" are just a beginning of a new discipline
of the "totaliztic science", called the "telekinetics".
Part #M:
What tragedies our civilisation is to avoid, if it makes effort to officially establish
two "mutually competing" sciences, i.e. if it complements the "atheistic orthodox
science" to-date with a competition in the form of newly formed "totaliztic science"
which is to develop and implement energy-generating devices of
telekinetics:
#M1.
Avoiding any further nuclear catastrophes - of the kind of explosion of four nuclear
reactors from Fukushima in Japan after the earthquake on Friday, 11 March 2011:
In present times "nuclear reactors" are the
most dangerous technical devices of
"everyday use" that exist on our planet".
How dangerous these reactors are, this was
proven by several "accidents" they caused,
for example the catastrophe in Chernobyl near
Kiev in Ukraine on 26 April 1986, or the recent
catastrophe in Fukushima, Japan, after the earthquake
on Friday, 11 March 2011. So if someone builds
so dangerous devices, all would expect, that the
"safety" is to be the most vital goal to be fulfilled
during the development of their design. However,
when I analysed the design of these four Japanese
nuclear reactors which exploded after the earthquake
on Friday, 11 March 2011, then in spite that
I am NOT an expert in atomic energy, still I
detected in them several cardinal design errors,
which are so elementary and so obvious, that
they inspire to asking the question "what kind
of an 'engineer' designed these nuclear reactors".
This is because these cardinal design errors
look as if someone intentionally designed
these reactors to make sure that they eventually
are to cause a disaster. If we would impose a
condition "how to build nuclear reactors to make
them the most dangerous possible and to make
sure that one day they explode", then this condition
would be met in these Japanese reactors. In
the result, these reactors were just "an accident
awaiting to happen". So sufficed the earthquake
described more thoroughly in item #C7 of the web
page named
seismograph.htm,
to make this accident come true.
I will explain here what are these most cardinal
design errors committed during the design of
the abovementioned Japanese nuclear reactors.
Namely, in design sciences exist something that
we could call the "most important principle of
designing all dangerous devices". In "my times"
this principle was lectured in Poland to every
student of engineering. It states that "the
operation of dangerous devices must always
be so designed, that in case of any breakdown,
the work of this devices must self-cease immediately
just because of the action of its design, laws of
nature, and forces of nature". It is because
of this principle, that for example dangerous presses
and machines which can tear-off hands of their
operators, must be so designed that their dangerous
action can be switched on only if the operator
keeps pressing two separate buttons with both
his hands simultaneously. Applying this principle
to nuclear reactors discussed here, their design
and operation should be so designed, that in case
of any breakdown, solely the design of these
devices, gravity forces, and laws of nuclear
reactions, would just by themselves stop their
operation. However, even a brief analysis of
designs of these reactors reveals, that they were
so designed, that in case of a breakdown, their
design, gravity forces, and laws of nuclear reactions
caused the escalation of their operation, instead
stopping them. Therefore, I personally do NOT
understand what is for the so-called "Atomic
Energy Agency" with all these well-paid "experts",
that it did NOT check and identify these cardinal
design errors, and did NOT stop the building of
so faulty reactors.
...(the translation of this item is to be finished later)...
Aby przypomnieć tutaj działanie reaktora atomowego,
to polega ono na wsuwaniu prętów "paliwa atomowego"
do specjalnej obudowy po angielsku zwanej "core".
(Jeśli dobrze pamiętam, to w polskiej atomistyce
"core" tlumaczy się jako "kora".) Po ich wsunięciu, całkowita
masa owego paliwa jądrowego zaczyna przekraczać
tzw. "masę krytyczną" - co inicjuje reakcję jądrową.
Aby zaś reakcją jądrową można było sterować,
niezależnie od prętów paliwowych, do owej "kory"
wsuwane lub wysuwane są też dodatkowe
"pręty sterujące" które absorbują neutrony i w
ten sposób zatrzymują reakcję jądrową. Aby
więc reakcję jądrową zintensyfikować, trzeba
do reaktora wsunąć "pręty paliwowe", zaś wysunąć
owe "pręty sterujące". Z kolei aby reakcję jądrową
wyciszyć lub zatrzymać, do reaktora trzeba wsunąć
owe "pręty sterujące" zaś wysunąć z niego owe
"pręty paliwowe".
Jeśli więc ktoś projektuje reaktor atomowy, wówczas
aby spełnić powyżej opisaną "najważniejszą zasadę
projektowania wszelkich urządzeń o niebezpiecznym
działaniu", powinien tak reaktor ten zaprojektować,
żeby "pręty paliwowe" wsuwane były do "kory" reaktora
"od spodu", zaś "pręty sterujące" wsuwane tam były
"od góry". W przypadku bowiem jakiejkolwiek awarii,
kiedy to urządzenia sterujące reaktorem przestaną
działać, zwykłe siły grawitacji spowodowalyby, że
"pręty sterujące" same zaczęłyby zsuwać się w dół
do "kory" - w ten sposób wyciszając reakcję jądrową,
natomiast pręty paliwowe same zaczęłyby wysuwać
się w dół z owej "kory" - w ten sposób dodatkowo
wyciszając reakcję jądrową. Schemat owych czterech
reaktorów z Fukushima które eksplodowały w Japonii,
opublikowany został w artykule "Growing terror"
(tj. "Rosnący strach") ze strony A2 gazety
The New Zealand Herald,
wydanie ze środy (Wednesday), March 16, 2011. Co
mnie w schemacie tym natychmiast uderzyło, to że
w japońskich reaktorach wsuwanie obu rodzajów
prętów następowało w dokładnie przeciwny do logiki
sposób. Mianowicie, "pręty sterujące" wsuwane były
od spodu, zaś "prety paliwowe" wsuwane były od
góry. W rezultacie, kiedy trzęsienie ziemi uszkodziło
urządzenia wsuwające i wysuwające owe pręty, siły
grawitacji i ciepło spowodowały że "pręty sterujące"
same się wysunęły - intensyfikując w ten sposób reakcję
jądrową, zaś "pręty paliwowe" same się dodatkowo
powsuwały" - reakcję tą jeszcze bardziej zaogniając.
Na dodatek do tego, kolejnym "kardynalnym błędem
konstrukcyjnym" owych reaktorów było, że sama
"kora" była zaprojektowana w formie pionowego
cylindra o wklęśle zaokrąglonym dnie. Kiedy więc owo
niekontrolowane intensyfikowanie reakcji jądrowej
spowodowało stopienie się paliwa jądrowego i jego
spłynięcie na spód "kory", zaokrąglony spód
owego cylindra spowodował zgromadzenie się
w nim i zespolenie razem całego stopionego
paliwa jądrowego, tak że paliwo to przekroczyło
"masę krytyczną" i zamieniło reaktor w "bombę
atomową". Nic dziwnego że następstwa były takie
jakie były. Oczywiście, nieszczęścia spowodowane
przez te reaktory można było prosto pomniejszyć, gdyby
spody ich "kory", zamiast kształtu wklęsłych kulistych
czasz skupiających paliwo jądrowe, otrzymały kształty
wypukłych gwiazd które by rozczłonkowywały to paliwo
na kilka podkrytycznych mas.
Co mnie zastanawia, to kto weryfikował konstrukcję
owych reaktorów zawierającą w sobie aż tyle
"kardynalnych błędów konstrukcyjnych" i kto
dopuścił aby reaktory te były wogóle zbudowane.
Chociaż bowiem istnieje tzw. "Agencja Energii
Atomowej", co naprawdę owa agencja czyni
pozostaje sekretem jakiego nikomu postronnemu nie udaje
się zgłębić. Kiedy odwiedzałem Polskę w niedługi
czas po katastrofie nuklearnej w Czernobylu na Ukrainie
z dnia 26 kwietnia 1986 roku, w telewziji i gazetach
ówczesnej Polski prowadzona była intensywna
kampania argumentująca że owa "Agencja Energii
Atomowej" jest organizacją sekretywną, hermetycznie
zamkniętą, unikającą ujawniania prawdy, ukrywającą
liczne popełniane błędy i w sumie działającą na
szkodę ludzkości oraz narodów którym jakoby ma
ona służyć. Jako zaś taka, agencja ta powinna natychmiast
zostać rozwiązania. Jak jednak wiemy, agencja
ta NIE została rozwiązana. Z kolei artykuły w
rodzaju "Secretive nuclear industry hard to trust"
(tj. "Utrzymującemu sekrety przemysłowi
jądrowemu trudno zaufać") ze strony A15 gazety
The New Zealand Herald,
(wydanie z czwartku (Thursday), March 17, 2011)
ujawniają że nadal działa ona na swoje dawne sposoby.
W rezultacie, ogromnie rzadko można spotkać
kogoś, kto faktycznie popiera rozwój energii atomowej.
Energia ta zrodziła się wszakże z wojny, sekretów i
zniszczenia, oraz do dzisiaj utrzymuje tradycje
wojowniczości, sekretów, okłamywania i niszczenia.
Innymi słowy, energia atomowa jest najdokonalszą
ilustracją wyjaśnionej w punkcie #C1 tej strony palącej
konieczności, aby dla dotychczasowej "ateistycznej
nauki ortodoksyjnej" jak najszybciej stworzyć moralniejszą
od niej "konkurencję" która by "patrzyła jej na ręce"
oraz otwierała do publicznego wglądu jej niemoralne
i kłamliwe metody działania.
Kiedy ja studiowałem w Polsce w czasach komunistycznych,
ówcześni studenci "nabijali się" z tzw. "kursów partyjnych"
które starannie wybranym "działaczom" dawały dyplomy
"magistra" lub "inżyniera" po zaledwie krótkim przeszkoleniu.
Faktycznie też, jeśli ktoś przeanalizuje Zachodnie systemy
edukacyjne - co ja dokonałem m.in. w punkcie #F1 strony
rok.htm,
to okazuje się że rzeczywiście są one jak owe "kursy partyjne"
z komunistycznej Polski - tj. "rozdają" dyplomy inżynierskie
niedouczonym aspirantom po nawet krótszym przeszkoleniu
niż kiedyś w Polsce trzeba było się szkolić aby nabyć
prawa "kreślarza" a nie "inżyniera". Osobiście mam wrażenie
że owe japońskie reaktory jądrowe projektowali i weryfikowali
właśnie "inżynierowie" zaraz po ukończeniu takiego
rodzaju edukacji.
Po odkryciu że japońskie reaktory jądrowe kryją
w sobie aż tak kardynalne usterki konstrukcyjne,
zaglądnąłem do konstrukcji "typowego reaktora
jądrowego" opublikowanej na stronie 585 z tomu
14 (dla litery "N" i dla hasla "Nuclear Energy")
Amerykańskiej encyklopedii o tytule "The World
Book Encyclopedia" (World Book, Inc., Chicago,
USA, 2003, ISBN 0-7166-0103-6). Z szokiem
wówczas stwierdziłem, że tamta konstrukcja
reaktorów japońskich jest "typową" konstrukcją
tych urządzeń, oraz że na świecie dosłownie aż
się roi od tak samo wadliwych reaktorów atomowych.
Ten fakt wzajemnego podobieństwa wad wszystkich
reaktorów jest zresztą potwierdzony inną katastrofą
atomową która miała miejsce w dniu w dniu 28 marca
1979 roku w reaktorze z "Three Mile Island" z
Harrisburg koło Waszyngtonu DC. Tam również
przebieg katastrofy był niemal identyczny jak ów
niedawny z Fukushima w Japonii - tyle że zainicjowany
został nieco innym powodem niż trzęsienie ziemi.
Innymi słowy, tamten kataklizm jądrowy z Japonii
wcale NIE jest już ostatnim, zaś przy okazji następnego
dużego trzęsienia ziemi, lub jakiegoś innego nieszczęścia,
możemy się spodziewać następnych podobnych nuklearnych
kataklizmów w całym szeregu dalszych krajów.
Powinienem tu dodać, że opisywane tutaj "kardynalne
błędy konstrukcyjne" które sporo dzisiejszych reaktorów
jądrowych zamieniają w "bomby jądrowe jakie tylko
czekają na okazję aby eksplodować", streszczone
też zostały w punkcie #C7 totaliztycznej strony o nazwie
seismograph.htm.
Part #N:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#N1.
Summary of this web page:
This web page challenges practically the
most difficult task of humanity, i.e. the task
of constructing a telekinetic device which
generates continuous motion although it
does NOT require the supply in any form
of external energy.
#N2.
Blogs of totalizm:
It is also worth to check periodically the blog of
totalizm available at addresses
totalizm.wordpress.com and
totalizm.blox.pl/html.
(Notice that all these addresses hold the same
blog with the same content of messages.)
On this blog many matters discussed here are also explained with
additional details written as new events unveil before our eyes.
#N3.
Contact details with the
author
of this web page:
Current email addresses of the author of this web page, i.e.
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
(while for the duration of 2007 - Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak),
at which readers can post possible comments,
inquiries, or replies to questions which I ask on
my web pages, are provided on the web page
about me (Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak).
That page also provides my postal address
and telephone numbers.
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
Therefore, if the reader sends a request to me,
I suggest to let me know somehow that he or
she actually went through the trouble of reading
my web pages and learning what these pages
try to say.
If you prefer to read in Polish
click on the flag below
(Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w języku polskim
kliknij na poniższą flagę)
Date of starting this page: 17 June 2008.
Date of the latest updating of this page: 17 March 2011.
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
![Fig. #D1: Thesta-Distatica (tj. Fig. K4 z [1/4]). Odnotuj ze z powodu nachalnych sabotazy wyjasnionych na stronach evil.htm i fe_cell.htm, co wazniejsze ilustracje moga tu byc wymazane. Szukaj wowczas tych ilustracji na innych stronach z Menu (np. o darmowej energii lub z [1/4]).](/cgi-bin/i/14/14_k04_2.jpg)
